CACC vs HTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Hold and HTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CACC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -9.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
CACC is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.
HTZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-5.83% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| CACC | HTZ | CACC / HTZ | |
| Capitalization | 6.79B | 2.39B | 284% |
| EBITDA | 374M | 3.65B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 5.819 | 4.098 | 142% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.75 | 5.53 | 447% |
| Revenue | 1.88B | 9.37B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 13.2M | 764M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 5.07B | 17.8B | 28% |
CACC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CACC | HTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EUSB | 43.51 | 0.24 | +0.55% |
| iShares ESG Advanced Ttl USD Bd Mrkt ETF | |||
| FDVV | 47.66 | -2.08 | -4.18% |
| Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |||
| QTAP | 36.66 | -1.73 | -4.52% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April | |||
| OMFS | 36.34 | -2.26 | -5.85% |
| Invesco Russell 2000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| UGA | 60.54 | -4.92 | -7.51% |
| United States Gasoline | |||
HTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been closely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTZ | 100% | -5.93% | ||
| CAR - HTZ | 67% Closely correlated | -5.43% | ||
| BBDC - HTZ | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| CACC - HTZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.23% | ||
| LC - HTZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -12.12% | ||
| WD - HTZ | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
More | ||||