CACC
Price
$470.23
Change
-$20.51 (-4.18%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
WU
Price
$10.88
Change
-$0.26 (-2.33%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:36 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CACC vs WU

Header iconCACC vs WU Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs WUBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$470.23
Change-$20.51 (-4.18%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Western Union Company (The)
Price$10.88
Change-$0.26 (-2.33%)
Volume$65.67K
CapitalizationN/A
CACC vs WU Comparison Chart
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. WU commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Buy and WU is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CACC: $490.74 vs. WU: $11.14)
Brand notoriety: CACC and WU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 78% vs. WU: 168%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $6.79B vs. WU: $4.7B
CACC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.79B. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the long-term than WU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the short-term than CACC.

Price Growth

CACC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -5.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-5.00% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CACC($6.79B) has a higher market cap than WU($4.7B). CACC has higher P/E ratio than WU: CACC (24.75) vs WU (8.18). WU YTD gains are higher at: -1.107 vs. CACC (-7.882). WU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. CACC (374M). WU has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. CACC (13.2M). WU has less debt than CACC: WU (2.67B) vs CACC (5.07B). WU has higher revenues than CACC: WU (4.36B) vs CACC (1.88B).
CACCWUCACC / WU
Capitalization6.79B4.7B144%
EBITDA374M1.04B36%
Gain YTD-7.882-1.107712%
P/E Ratio24.758.18303%
Revenue1.88B4.36B43%
Total Cash13.2M3.22B0%
Total Debt5.07B2.67B190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
6412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2884
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CACC's Valuation (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (72). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (100). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

WU's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (64). This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (57). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (84). This means that CACC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDSF18.83N/A
N/A
First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF
HYLG24.00N/A
N/A
Global X Health Care Cvrd Cll&Gr ETF
RWR103.36-0.28
-0.27%
SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF
GSJY38.34-0.21
-0.54%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF
INCO67.65-0.57
-0.84%
Columbia India Consumer ETF

WU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WU has been loosely correlated with BBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WU jumps, then BBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WU
1D Price
Change %
WU100%
-0.45%
BBDC - WU
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
UPBD - WU
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
OMF - WU
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.50%
CACC - WU
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
SLM - WU
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More