CACC
Price
$523.61
Change
+$7.26 (+1.41%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.79B
34 days until earnings call
WU
Price
$10.55
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.7B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CACC vs WU

Header iconCACC vs WU Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs WUBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$523.61
Change+$7.26 (+1.41%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6.79B
Western Union Company (The)
Price$10.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$49.36K
Capitalization4.7B
CACC vs WU Comparison Chart
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. WU commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a StrongBuy and WU is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $516.35 vs. WU: $10.58)
Brand notoriety: CACC and WU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 123% vs. WU: 82%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $6.79B vs. WU: $4.7B
CACC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.79B. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CACC and WU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the short-term than WU.

Price Growth

CACC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.37% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CACC($6.79B) has a higher market cap than WU($4.7B). CACC has higher P/E ratio than WU: CACC (24.75) vs WU (8.18). CACC YTD gains are higher at: 9.988 vs. WU (2.057). WU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. CACC (374M). WU has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. CACC (13.2M). WU has less debt than CACC: WU (2.67B) vs CACC (5.07B). WU has higher revenues than CACC: WU (4.36B) vs CACC (1.88B).
CACCWUCACC / WU
Capitalization6.79B4.7B144%
EBITDA374M1.04B36%
Gain YTD9.9882.057486%
P/E Ratio24.758.18303%
Revenue1.88B4.36B43%
Total Cash13.2M3.22B0%
Total Debt5.07B2.67B190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1773
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
5712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4195
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WU's Valuation (27) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (70). This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (100). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

WU's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (57). This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (58). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (95). This means that CACC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSA41.370.30
+0.73%
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
JGRO73.790.09
+0.12%
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
SUPP57.74N/A
N/A
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
RGT10.50-0.02
-0.19%
Royce Global Value Trust
AEF4.96-0.04
-0.80%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.