Advertisement
OCSL vs WU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCSL is a Hold and WU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OCSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- OCSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OCSL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OCSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
OCSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while WU (@Savings Banks) price change was -5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
OCSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WU is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.09% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Savings Banks (-1.03% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| OCSL | WU | OCSL / WU | |
| Capitalization | 1.06B | 2.29B | 46% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 885M | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.002 | -19.378 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.40 | 5.38 | 379% |
| Revenue | 55.4M | 4.05B | 1% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.93B | - |
| Total Debt | 1.48B | 2.62B | 57% |
OCSL | WU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCSL's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as WU (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.
OCSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as WU (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.
WU's SMR Rating (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCSL (77) in the null industry. This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCSL’s over the last 12 months.
OCSL's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as WU (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.
WU's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCSL (99) in the null industry. This means that WU’s stock grew significantly faster than OCSL’s over the last 12 months.
| OCSL | WU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 1 day ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
OCSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCSL | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| PFLT - OCSL | 69% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| GBDC - OCSL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| BCSF - OCSL | 67% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ARCC - OCSL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NMFC - OCSL | 66% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||