It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.30% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.
CAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
CAG | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAG | FTXG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago51% | 20 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXG has been closely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXG jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG | 100% | -0.21% | ||
MDLZ - FTXG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
PEP - FTXG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
KHC - FTXG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
KO - FTXG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
CAG - FTXG | 69% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More |