CAHPF
Price
$5.78
Change
-$0.33 (-5.40%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.63B
CNL
Price
$11.11
Change
-$0.38 (-3.31%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
272.24M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs CNL

Header iconCAHPF vs CNL Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs CNLBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$5.78
Change-$0.33 (-5.40%)
Volume$18.85K
Capitalization4.63B
COLLECTIVE MINING
Price$11.11
Change-$0.38 (-3.31%)
Volume$102.85K
Capitalization272.24M
CAHPF vs CNL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. CNL commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Hold and CNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $5.78 vs. CNL: $11.11)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and CNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 31% vs. CNL: 54%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $4.63B vs. CNL: $272.24M
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.63B. CNL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $272.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than CNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while CNL (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNL is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.34% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($4.63B) has a higher market cap than CNL($272M). CNL YTD gains are higher at: 167.067 vs. CAHPF (94.124). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. CNL (-16.99M). CAHPF has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. CNL (26.7M). CNL has less debt than CAHPF: CNL (71.9K) vs CAHPF (605M). CAHPF has higher revenues than CNL: CAHPF (2.34B) vs CNL (0).
CAHPFCNLCAHPF / CNL
Capitalization4.63B272M1,703%
EBITDA1.02B-16.99M-5,998%
Gain YTD94.124167.06756%
P/E Ratio20.75N/A-
Revenue2.34B0-
Total Cash373M26.7M1,397%
Total Debt605M71.9K841,446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUHAX35.17N/A
N/A
DWS Health and Wellness A
PGPRX25.70N/A
N/A
George Putnam Balanced R
MMYAX7.99N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Value A
PGBEX46.06N/A
N/A
Principal Blue Chip R3
NBFAX32.02N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Focus Adv

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-5.56%
CNL - CAHPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
DGMLF - CAHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEM - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
PAAS - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
WGXRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
More

CNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNL has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNL jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNL
1D Price
Change %
CNL100%
-3.31%
AEM - CNL
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
RGLD - CNL
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.31%
OR - CNL
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
AGI - CNL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
WPM - CNL
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
More