CAHPF
Price
$5.46
Change
-$0.06 (-1.09%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
11.35B
PAAS
Price
$33.92
Change
+$0.99 (+3.01%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.23B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs PAAS

Header iconCAHPF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$5.46
Change-$0.06 (-1.09%)
Volume$8.96K
Capitalization11.35B
Pan American Silver
Price$33.92
Change+$0.99 (+3.01%)
Volume$4.29M
Capitalization12.23B
CAHPF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. PAAS commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $5.46 vs. PAAS: $33.92)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 195% vs. PAAS: 97%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $11.35B vs. PAAS: $12.23B
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.35B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $86.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3305.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($12.2B) has a higher market cap than CAHPF($11.4B). PAAS has higher P/E ratio than CAHPF: PAAS (23.39) vs CAHPF (18.07). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 83.536 vs. PAAS (69.834). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. PAAS (1.41B). CAHPF has higher revenues than PAAS: CAHPF (4.01B) vs PAAS (3.12B).
CAHPFPAASCAHPF / PAAS
Capitalization11.4B12.2B93%
EBITDA1.93B1.41B137%
Gain YTD83.53669.834120%
P/E Ratio18.0723.3977%
Revenue4.01B3.12B129%
Total CashN/A900M-
Total DebtN/A804M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5925
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
9185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (17) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CAHPF (91) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CAHPF (40) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIV25.360.01
+0.02%
SPDR SSGA Apollo IG Public & Private Credit ETF
RATE17.42N/A
N/A
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
FDEC48.17-0.18
-0.37%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
TRND32.80-0.23
-0.68%
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
SVXY48.74-0.47
-0.96%
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-1.09%
CNL - CAHPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
NEM - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PAAS - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
WGXRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
OR - CAHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
More