CAHPF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.07 (-0.99%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.89B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
WGXRF
Price
$3.36
Change
-$0.08 (-2.33%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs WGXRF

Header iconCAHPF vs WGXRF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs WGXRFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$7.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.99%)
Volume$41.96K
Capitalization13.89B
Westgold Resources
Price$3.36
Change-$0.08 (-2.33%)
Volume$91.89K
Capitalization3.16B
CAHPF vs WGXRF Comparison Chart in %
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGXRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. WGXRF commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Hold and WGXRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $7.00 vs. WGXRF: $3.36)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and WGXRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 574% vs. WGXRF: 55%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $13.89B vs. WGXRF: $3.16B
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.89B. WGXRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWGXRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WGXRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than WGXRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGXRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WGXRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the short-term than WGXRF.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while WGXRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4561.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.83% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than WGXRF($3.16B). WGXRF has higher P/E ratio than CAHPF: WGXRF (135.97) vs CAHPF (23.25). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 135.302 vs. WGXRF (92.011).
CAHPFWGXRFCAHPF / WGXRF
Capitalization13.9B3.16B439%
EBITDA1.93BN/A-
Gain YTD135.30292.011147%
P/E Ratio23.25135.9717%
Revenue4.01BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs WGXRF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
WGXRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
421
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WGXRF (80). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WGXRF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WGXRF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

WGXRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (40). This means that WGXRF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

WGXRF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (42). This means that WGXRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFWGXRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGXRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XMHQ106.051.05
+1.00%
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
DXUV59.180.52
+0.89%
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF
EFO61.520.27
+0.45%
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
DBB21.600.09
+0.42%
Invesco DB Base Metals
CAOS90.03-0.03
-0.03%
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-1.06%
CNL - CAHPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
NEM - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.23%
PAAS - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
WGXRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
OR - CAHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More

WGXRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WGXRF and MAUTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGXRF and MAUTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGXRF
1D Price
Change %
WGXRF100%
-2.33%
MAUTF - WGXRF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.53%
ODV - WGXRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.34%
GUYGF - WGXRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
SA - WGXRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
RRDMF - WGXRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.62%
More