CAIXY vs SCGLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAIXY is a Hold and SCGLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAIXY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CAIXY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SCGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAIXY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAIXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SCGLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CAIXY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while SCGLY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCGLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CAIXY | SCGLY | CAIXY / SCGLY | |
| Capitalization | 30.2B | 22.2B | 136% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.564 | 7.207 | 591% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.86 | 15.11 | 52% |
| Revenue | 14.6B | 38.6B | 38% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 53B | 154B | 34% |
CAIXY | SCGLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCGLY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIXY (26). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CAIXY’s over the last 12 months.
CAIXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGLY (84). This means that CAIXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.
CAIXY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (5). This means that CAIXY’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.
SCGLY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIXY (53). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CAIXY’s over the last 12 months.
CAIXY's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (82). This means that CAIXY’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.
| CAIXY | SCGLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 54% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCISX | 9.80 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
| Calamos International Small Cap Gr C | |||
| TAMMX | 37.14 | -0.06 | -0.16% |
| Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced R6 | |||
| MRSPX | 15.97 | -0.18 | -1.11% |
| BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap R | |||
| HSMFX | 13.40 | -0.21 | -1.54% |
| Hartford Small Cap Value F | |||
| FCPVX | 21.27 | -0.36 | -1.66% |
| Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | |||
CAIXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAIXY has been loosely correlated with CHBJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAIXY jumps, then CHBJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAIXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAIXY | 100% | -2.78% | ||
| CHBJF - CAIXY | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UNCRY - CAIXY | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| ISNPY - CAIXY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| SYANY - CAIXY | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SCGLY - CAIXY | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
SCGLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLY has been closely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCGLY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCGLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCGLY | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| BNPQY - SCGLY | 72% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| ISNPY - SCGLY | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| CRARY - SCGLY | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| KBCSY - SCGLY | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| UNCRY - SCGLY | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||