It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDRSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAJFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DRSHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAJFF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DRSHF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +5.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +7.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +62.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +123.73%.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
CAJFF | DRSHF | CAJFF / DRSHF | |
Capitalization | 26.1B | 117M | 22,308% |
EBITDA | 616B | -3.28M | -18,777,946% |
Gain YTD | 23.300 | 61.538 | 38% |
P/E Ratio | 14.29 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.15T | 16.8M | 24,672,619% |
Total Cash | 545B | 10.2M | 5,343,137% |
Total Debt | 663B | 596K | 111,241,611% |
CAJFF | DRSHF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAJFF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DRSHF (64). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as DRSHF (80). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as DRSHF (79). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DRSHF (65). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as DRSHF (67). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF | DRSHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago48% | 1 day ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | 1 day ago86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJFF and SCKT have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJFF and SCKT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAJFF | 100% | N/A | ||
SCKT - CAJFF | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.01% | ||
SSYS - CAJFF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.30% | ||
DRSHF - CAJFF | 7% Poorly correlated | +8.39% | ||
RCAT - CAJFF | 7% Poorly correlated | -15.72% | ||
MKFG - CAJFF | 4% Poorly correlated | -6.13% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DRSHF and CAN have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRSHF and CAN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DRSHF | 100% | +8.39% | ||
CAN - DRSHF | 15% Poorly correlated | -12.79% | ||
HAUP - DRSHF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EBON - DRSHF | 8% Poorly correlated | -13.41% | ||
AGMH - DRSHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
CAJFF - DRSHF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |