CALRF vs GGLDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALRF is a Hold and GGLDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CALRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CALRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GGLDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CALRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| CALRF | GGLDF | CALRF / GGLDF | |
| Capitalization | 52.5M | 19.2M | 273% |
| EBITDA | -8.07M | -6.98M | 116% |
| Gain YTD | -34.571 | -16.877 | 205% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 385K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 7.05M | 841K | 839% |
| Total Debt | 2.93M | 90K | 3,250% |
| CALRF | GGLDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTSL | 46.22 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| First Trust Senior Loan ETF | |||
| GTIP | 48.68 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF | |||
| SIXH | 36.88 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
| ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF | |||
| DVYA | 36.37 | -0.17 | -0.46% |
| iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | |||
| IBRN | 26.20 | -0.17 | -0.66% |
| iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | |||
CALRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CALRF has been loosely correlated with NPTLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CALRF jumps, then NPTLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CALRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NPTLF - CALRF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GGLDF - CALRF | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| FFOXF - CALRF | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| GAU - CALRF | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| NSGCF - CALRF | 30% Poorly correlated | -9.59% | ||
More | ||||
GGLDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGLDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGLDF | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| CALRF - GGLDF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GAU - GGLDF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
| THM - GGLDF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| PAAS - GGLDF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KGC - GGLDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||