Ad is loading...
CALZF
Price
$1.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
CBSC
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

CALZF vs CBSC

Header iconCALZF vs CBSC Comparison
Open Charts CALZF vs CBSCBanner chart's image
Polynovo
Price$1.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.1K
CapitalizationN/A
CB Scientific
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$69.23K
CapitalizationN/A
CALZF vs CBSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CALZF vs. CBSC commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALZF is a Hold and CBSC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CALZF: $1.31 vs. CBSC: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CALZF and CBSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CALZF: 74% vs. CBSC: 200%
Market capitalization -- CALZF: $724.04M vs. CBSC: $21.25M
CALZF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $724.04M. CBSC’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $21.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CALZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCBSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CALZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CBSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBSC is a better buy in the long-term than CALZF.

Price Growth

CALZF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.07% price change this week, while CBSC (@Medical Specialties) price change was +56.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.14% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CALZF($724M) has a higher market cap than CBSC($21.3M). CALZF YTD gains are higher at: 63.750 vs. CBSC (-36.364). CBSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.29M vs. CALZF (-4.67M). CALZF has more cash in the bank: 6.15M vs. CBSC (8.53K). CBSC has less debt than CALZF: CBSC (100K) vs CALZF (11M). CALZF has higher revenues than CBSC: CALZF (52.7M) vs CBSC (131K).
CALZFCBSCCALZF / CBSC
Capitalization724M21.3M3,399%
EBITDA-4.67M-2.29M203%
Gain YTD63.750-36.364-175%
P/E Ratio2000.00N/A-
Revenue52.7M131K40,229%
Total Cash6.15M8.53K72,147%
Total Debt11M100K11,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CALZF vs CBSC: Fundamental Ratings
CALZF
CBSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2889
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
77100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
994
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CALZF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSC (100). This means that CALZF’s stock grew similarly to CBSC’s over the last 12 months.

CALZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSC (100). This means that CALZF’s stock grew similarly to CBSC’s over the last 12 months.

CALZF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSC (100). This means that CALZF’s stock grew similarly to CBSC’s over the last 12 months.

CALZF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSC (63). This means that CALZF’s stock grew similarly to CBSC’s over the last 12 months.

CBSC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CALZF (99). This means that CBSC’s stock grew significantly faster than CALZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBUY65.350.74
+1.14%
Amplify Online Retail ETF
KOKU102.450.57
+0.56%
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
FPFD21.920.03
+0.14%
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Inc ETF
APRD25.010.01
+0.04%
Innovator Premium Income 10 Bar ETF -Apr
JCPB46.52-0.01
-0.02%
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF

CALZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CALZF and SERA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CALZF and SERA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CALZF
1D Price
Change %
CALZF100%
N/A
SERA - CALZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
BBLG - CALZF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
CHEOF - CALZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHEOY - CALZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
CBSC - CALZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+55.56%
More

CBSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBSC and QTI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBSC and QTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBSC
1D Price
Change %
CBSC100%
+55.56%
QTI - CBSC
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.97%
LNSR - CBSC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
CALZF - CBSC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBLG - CBSC
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
BLOZF - CBSC
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More