CALZF
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.03 (-2.34%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CHEOF
Price
$180.01
Change
+$3.76 (+2.13%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

CALZF vs CHEOF

Header iconCALZF vs CHEOF Comparison
Open Charts CALZF vs CHEOFBanner chart's image
Polynovo
Price$1.25
Change-$0.03 (-2.34%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
CochLear
Price$180.01
Change+$3.76 (+2.13%)
Volume$255
CapitalizationN/A
CALZF vs CHEOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CALZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHEOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CALZF vs. CHEOF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALZF is a StrongSell and CHEOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CALZF: $1.25 vs. CHEOF: $180.01)
Brand notoriety: CALZF and CHEOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CALZF: 126% vs. CHEOF: 396%
Market capitalization -- CALZF: $724.04M vs. CHEOF: $10.47B
CALZF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $724.04M. CHEOF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $10.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CALZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHEOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CALZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CHEOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHEOF is a better buy in the long-term than CALZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CALZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHEOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CALZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CHEOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CALZF is a better buy in the short-term than CHEOF.

Price Growth

CALZF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -10.71% price change this week, while CHEOF (@Medical Specialties) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-1.51% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEOF($10.5B) has a higher market cap than CALZF($724M). CALZF has higher P/E ratio than CHEOF: CALZF (2000.00) vs CHEOF (60.61). CALZF YTD gains are higher at: 56.250 vs. CHEOF (-9.316). CHEOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 434M vs. CALZF (-4.67M). CHEOF has more cash in the bank: 629M vs. CALZF (6.15M). CALZF has less debt than CHEOF: CALZF (11M) vs CHEOF (254M). CHEOF has higher revenues than CALZF: CHEOF (1.71B) vs CALZF (52.7M).
CALZFCHEOFCALZF / CHEOF
Capitalization724M10.5B7%
EBITDA-4.67M434M-1%
Gain YTD56.250-9.316-604%
P/E Ratio2000.0060.613,300%
Revenue52.7M1.71B3%
Total Cash6.15M629M1%
Total Debt11M254M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CALZF vs CHEOF: Fundamental Ratings
CALZF
CHEOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9547
SMR RATING
1..100
7743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4775
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHEOF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CALZF (90). This means that CHEOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CALZF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CALZF (95). This means that CHEOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CALZF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEOF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CALZF (77). This means that CHEOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CALZF’s over the last 12 months.

CALZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEOF (75). This means that CALZF’s stock grew similarly to CHEOF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEOF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CALZF (98). This means that CHEOF’s stock grew similarly to CALZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CALZFCHEOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CALZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHEOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSCRX19.560.24
+1.24%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R
NWCFX63.620.78
+1.24%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
SEVAX40.840.40
+0.99%
NAA SMid Cap Value A
EGRYX17.890.15
+0.85%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr Inst
VFWPX119.45-1.38
-1.14%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus

CALZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CALZF and SERA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CALZF and SERA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CALZF
1D Price
Change %
CALZF100%
N/A
SERA - CALZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+8.00%
BBLG - CALZF
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
CHEOF - CALZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
CHEOY - CALZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
CBSC - CALZF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CHEOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHEOF and FSPKF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHEOF and FSPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHEOF
1D Price
Change %
CHEOF100%
+2.13%
FSPKF - CHEOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
A - CHEOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CHEOY - CHEOF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BMXMF - CHEOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CALZF - CHEOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More