Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAML vs SCHG
CAML vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts CAML vs SCHG
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$37.76
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
Volume$300
Net Assets322.15M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$4.78K
Net Assets47.47B
CAML vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAML vs. SCHG commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAML is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 47.5B vs. CAML (322M). CAML has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: CAML (11.223) vs SCHG (10.412). CAML was incepted earlier than SCHG: CAML (2 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CAML (0.65). CAML has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| CAML | SCHG | CAML / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 11.223 | 10.412 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 322M | 47.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 3.00 | 1,100% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.38 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CAML | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CAML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAML and ECL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAML and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAML | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| ECL - CAML | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AAPL - CAML | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ROP - CAML | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| ZTS - CAML | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| TJX - CAML | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||