CAMZF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.81M
PALAF
Price
$4.72
Change
-$0.15 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAMZF vs PALAF

Header iconCAMZF vs PALAF Comparison
Open Charts CAMZF vs PALAFBanner chart's image
Camino Minerals
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.57K
Capitalization9.81M
Paladin Energy
Price$4.72
Change-$0.15 (-3.08%)
Volume$34.45K
Capitalization1.53B
CAMZF vs PALAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAMZF vs. PALAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMZF is a Hold and PALAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CAMZF: $0.25 vs. PALAF: $4.72)
Brand notoriety: CAMZF and PALAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAMZF: 47% vs. PALAF: 32%
Market capitalization -- CAMZF: $9.81M vs. PALAF: $1.53B
CAMZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.81M. PALAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAMZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePALAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PALAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAMZF is a better buy in the long-term than PALAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAMZF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PALAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAMZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PALAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAMZF is a better buy in the short-term than PALAF.

Price Growth

CAMZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -13.19% price change this week, while PALAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

PALAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PALAF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than CAMZF($9.81M). CAMZF YTD gains are higher at: 32.275 vs. PALAF (4.656). CAMZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.03M vs. PALAF (-23.79M). PALAF has more cash in the bank: 178M vs. CAMZF (500K). CAMZF has less debt than PALAF: CAMZF (130K) vs PALAF (79.5M). PALAF has higher revenues than CAMZF: PALAF (4.7M) vs CAMZF (0).
CAMZFPALAFCAMZF / PALAF
Capitalization9.81M1.53B1%
EBITDA-3.03M-23.79M13%
Gain YTD32.2754.656693%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue04.7M-
Total Cash500K178M0%
Total Debt130K79.5M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAMZF vs PALAF: Fundamental Ratings
CAMZF
PALAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
897
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAMZF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PALAF (80). This means that CAMZF’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CAMZF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CAMZF (98). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.

CAMZF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as PALAF (56). This means that CAMZF’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CAMZF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAMZFPALAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA316.0610.76
+3.52%
Tesla
SPY637.102.68
+0.42%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL213.880.12
+0.06%
Apple
BTC.X117635.880000-732.117200
-0.62%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME23.33-0.20
-0.85%
GameStop Corp

CAMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAMZF and ARSMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAMZF and ARSMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMZF
1D Price
Change %
CAMZF100%
N/A
ARSMF - CAMZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
PALAF - CAMZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
MJDLF - CAMZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
ABRMF - CAMZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSM - CAMZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More

PALAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PALAF and AUMC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALAF and AUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PALAF
1D Price
Change %
PALAF100%
-3.03%
AUMC - PALAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALE - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
CAMZF - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLLTL - PALAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
NB - PALAF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More