CAMZF vs PALAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMZF is a StrongBuy and PALAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAMZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePALAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PALAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAMZF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PALAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAMZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PALAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAMZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while PALAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
PALAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CAMZF | PALAF | CAMZF / PALAF | |
| Capitalization | 9.81M | 1.53B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -3.03M | -23.79M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -35.193 | -29.167 | 121% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 4.7M | - |
| Total Cash | 500K | 178M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 130K | 79.5M | 0% |
CAMZF | PALAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAMZF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PALAF (82). This means that CAMZF’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.
PALAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAMZF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.
PALAF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CAMZF (98). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.
CAMZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PALAF (84). This means that CAMZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PALAF’s over the last 12 months.
PALAF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CAMZF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to CAMZF’s over the last 12 months.
| CAMZF | PALAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
CAMZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAMZF and ARSMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAMZF and ARSMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAMZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMZF | 100% | +5.32% | ||
| ARSMF - CAMZF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| PALAF - CAMZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| MJDLF - CAMZF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| ABRMF - CAMZF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GSM - CAMZF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||
PALAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PALAF and AUMC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALAF and AUMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALAF | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| AUMC - PALAF | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.81% | ||
| VALE - PALAF | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.90% | ||
| CAMZF - PALAF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLLTL - PALAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.75% | ||
| NB - PALAF | 19% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
More | ||||