Advertisement
CAN vs CREAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAN is a Hold and CREAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCREAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CREAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CREAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- CREAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CAN (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -10.64% price change this week, while CREAF (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +14.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -8.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -17.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-8.66% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| CAN | CREAF | CAN / CREAF | |
| Capitalization | 542M | 31.6M | 1,715% |
| EBITDA | -184.66M | -9.04M | 2,043% |
| Gain YTD | -52.922 | -41.162 | 129% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 345M | 67.4M | 512% |
| Total Cash | 65.9M | 29.8M | 221% |
| Total Debt | 48.2M | 970K | 4,969% |
CAN | CREAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAN's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (43). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.
CAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (100). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.
CREAF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CAN (96). This means that CREAF’s stock grew similarly to CAN’s over the last 12 months.
CAN's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (83). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.
CAN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CREAF (99). This means that CAN’s stock grew significantly faster than CREAF’s over the last 12 months.
| CAN | CREAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 34% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 31% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 28% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 46% |
Advertisement
CREAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CREAF and HAUP have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREAF and HAUP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CREAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CREAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HAUP - CREAF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QMCO - CREAF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| AGMH - CREAF | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
| DELL - CREAF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| CAN - CREAF | -2% Poorly correlated | -6.30% | ||
More | ||||