CANOF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.2M
CGIFF
Price
$8.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
732.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANOF vs CGIFF

Header iconCANOF vs CGIFF Comparison
Open Charts CANOF vs CGIFFBanner chart's image
California Nanotechnologies
Price$0.39
Change-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Volume$69.41K
Capitalization4.2M
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
Price$8.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.32K
Capitalization732.14M
CANOF vs CGIFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANOF vs. CGIFF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANOF is a Hold and CGIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CANOF: $0.39 vs. CGIFF: $8.07)
Brand notoriety: CANOF and CGIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANOF: 158% vs. CGIFF: 210%
Market capitalization -- CANOF: $4.2M vs. CGIFF: $732.14M
CANOF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.2M. CGIFF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $732.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGIFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CANOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGIFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGIFF is a better buy in the long-term than CANOF.

Price Growth

CANOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -8.04% price change this week, while CGIFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.90% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGIFF($732M) has a higher market cap than CANOF($4.2M). CANOF has higher P/E ratio than CGIFF: CANOF (72.46) vs CGIFF (5.58). CGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 6.746 vs. CANOF (-31.397). CGIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 565M vs. CANOF (618K). CGIFF has more cash in the bank: 21.5M vs. CANOF (292K). CANOF has less debt than CGIFF: CANOF (1.72M) vs CGIFF (864M). CGIFF has higher revenues than CANOF: CGIFF (1.85B) vs CANOF (1.49M).
CANOFCGIFFCANOF / CGIFF
Capitalization4.2M732M1%
EBITDA618K565M0%
Gain YTD-31.3976.746-465%
P/E Ratio72.465.581,298%
Revenue1.49M1.85B0%
Total Cash292K21.5M1%
Total Debt1.72M864M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANOF vs CGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
CANOF
CGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7020
SMR RATING
1..100
9251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGIFF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANOF (95). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANOF (70). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANOF (92). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (52). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIFF (13). This means that CANOF’s stock grew similarly to CGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALVOF4.330.01
+0.24%
Alvopetro Energy Ltd
SRNW0.14N/A
N/A
Stratos Renewables Corp.
CLPHY8.36-0.01
-0.08%
CLP Holdings Ltd.
REMYY5.31-0.06
-1.12%
Remy Cointreau SA
DSNKY24.19-0.36
-1.47%
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

CANOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANOF and CGIFF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANOF and CGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANOF
1D Price
Change %
CANOF100%
-4.52%
CGIFF - CANOF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLZNY - CANOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNTGY - CANOF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
COIHY - CANOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
BRRDF - CANOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIFF has been loosely correlated with ECVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIFF jumps, then ECVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIFF
1D Price
Change %
CGIFF100%
N/A
ECVT - CGIFF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CE - CGIFF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
HWKN - CGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
PRM - CGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
AVNT - CGIFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
More