CANOF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.86M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
CLZNY
Price
$8.66
Change
-$0.16 (-1.81%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANOF vs CLZNY

Header iconCANOF vs CLZNY Comparison
Open Charts CANOF vs CLZNYBanner chart's image
California Nanotechnologies
Price$0.29
Change-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Volume$54.7K
Capitalization13.86M
Clariant AG
Price$8.66
Change-$0.16 (-1.81%)
Volume$248
Capitalization2.89B
CANOF vs CLZNY Comparison Chart in %
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANOF vs. CLZNY commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANOF is a Hold and CLZNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CANOF: $0.29 vs. CLZNY: $8.66)
Brand notoriety: CANOF and CLZNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANOF: 105% vs. CLZNY: 54%
Market capitalization -- CANOF: $13.86M vs. CLZNY: $2.89B
CANOF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $13.86M. CLZNY’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $211.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLZNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CANOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLZNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CANOF is a better buy in the long-term than CLZNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLZNY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLZNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLZNY is a better buy in the short-term than CANOF.

Price Growth

CANOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -27.14% price change this week, while CLZNY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -8.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLZNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.92% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLZNY($2.89B) has a higher market cap than CANOF($13.9M). CANOF has higher P/E ratio than CLZNY: CANOF (196.27) vs CLZNY (20.49). CLZNY YTD gains are higher at: -20.139 vs. CANOF (-48.702). CLZNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 599M vs. CANOF (-340.99K). CLZNY has more cash in the bank: 449M vs. CANOF (463K). CANOF has less debt than CLZNY: CANOF (1.55M) vs CLZNY (2.05B). CLZNY has higher revenues than CANOF: CLZNY (4.06B) vs CANOF (5.19M).
CANOFCLZNYCANOF / CLZNY
Capitalization13.9M2.89B0%
EBITDA-340.99K599M-0%
Gain YTD-48.702-20.139242%
P/E Ratio196.2720.49958%
Revenue5.19M4.06B0%
Total Cash463K449M0%
Total Debt1.55M2.05B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANOF vs CLZNY: Fundamental Ratings
CANOF
CLZNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6489
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLZNY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANOF (92). This means that CLZNY’s stock grew significantly faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CLZNY (100). This means that CANOF’s stock grew similarly to CLZNY’s over the last 12 months.

CLZNY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (99). This means that CLZNY’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CLZNY (89). This means that CANOF’s stock grew similarly to CLZNY’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLZNY (91). This means that CANOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLZNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANOFCLZNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNT40.421.28
+3.27%
Vontier Corp
FAT2.070.05
+2.73%
FAT Brands
WELL172.343.00
+1.77%
Welltower
RNGR12.760.10
+0.79%
Ranger Energy Services
GOOS13.01-0.49
-3.63%
Canada Goose Holdings

CANOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANOF and CGIFF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANOF and CGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANOF
1D Price
Change %
CANOF100%
-2.06%
CGIFF - CANOF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
CLZNY - CANOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNTGY - CANOF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
COIHY - CANOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BRRDF - CANOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLZNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLZNY and SXYAY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLZNY and SXYAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLZNY
1D Price
Change %
CLZNY100%
N/A
SXYAY - CLZNY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
AIQUF - CLZNY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
COIHF - CLZNY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CANOF - CLZNY
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
COIHY - CLZNY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More