Ad is loading...
CAPAX vs HBLAX
CAPAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts CAPAX vs HBLAX
Federated Hermes Capital Income A
Price$8.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.35M
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.21
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
CAPAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAPAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAPAX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. CAPAX (631M). HBLAX (3.37) and CAPAX (3.31) have matching dividends . CAPAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: CAPAX (37 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). CAPAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CAPAX (31.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CAPAX (5%) vs CAPAX (5%). CAPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: CAPAX (1500) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to CAPAX: HBLAX (2000) vs CAPAX (250). CAPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. HBLAX (3.15). CAPAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.05 vs. HBLAX (16.27).
| CAPAX | HBLAX | CAPAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.89 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.539 | 0.242 | -1,048% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2000 | 75% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 631M | 11.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.37 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 3.15 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.30 | 4.50 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.05 | 16.27 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.73 | 29.43 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...