Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAPAX vs HBLSX
CAPAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts CAPAX vs HBLSX
Federated Hermes Capital Income A
Price$9.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.1M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.93
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
CAPAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAPAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAPAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. CAPAX (669M). CAPAX (3.28) and HBLSX (3.24) have matching dividends . CAPAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: CAPAX (37 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). CAPAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CAPAX (31.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CAPAX: HBLSX (0) vs CAPAX (1500). CAPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.04 vs. HBLSX (4.97). CAPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.97 vs. HBLSX (14.73).
| CAPAX | HBLSX | CAPAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.96 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.96 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.419 | 6.452 | 99% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 669M | 11.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 3.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 4.97 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.38 | 14.34 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.97 | 14.73 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.56 | 41.17 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement