It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAPFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLPNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAPFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLPNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAPFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.00%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CAPFF | MLPNF | CAPFF / MLPNF | |
Capitalization | 198M | 14.7M | 1,347% |
EBITDA | 69M | -3.1M | -2,223% |
Gain YTD | 12.177 | 398.914 | 3% |
P/E Ratio | 11.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 290M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 28.4M | 1.9M | 1,492% |
Total Debt | 91.2M | 0 | - |
CAPFF | MLPNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago10% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago15% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago25% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAPFF has been loosely correlated with JMXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAPFF jumps, then JMXXF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAPFF | 100% | N/A | ||
JMXXF - CAPFF | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
AFBOF - CAPFF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HUSIF - CAPFF | 22% Poorly correlated | -12.72% | ||
MLPNF - CAPFF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
GRCMF - CAPFF | 7% Poorly correlated | +68.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MLPNF | 100% | -0.93% | ||
SIERF - MLPNF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NVAAF - MLPNF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
USCUF - MLPNF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
GRCMF - MLPNF | 18% Poorly correlated | +68.64% | ||
USGO - MLPNF | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
More |