CARCY
Price
$7.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
CBUMF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARCY vs CBUMF

Header iconCARCY vs CBUMF Comparison
Open Charts CARCY vs CBUMFBanner chart's image
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
Price$7.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.7B
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.55
Change+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization5.32B
CARCY vs CBUMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CARCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARCY vs. CBUMF commentary
Aug 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARCY is a Hold and CBUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CARCY: $7.40 vs. CBUMF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: CARCY and CBUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARCY: 233% vs. CBUMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CARCY: $1.7B vs. CBUMF: $5.32B
CARCY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.7B. CBUMF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCBUMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CARCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CARCY and CBUMF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARCY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CARCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CARCY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CBUMF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.21% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBUMF($5.33B) has a higher market cap than CARCY($1.7B). CARCY has higher P/E ratio than CBUMF: CARCY (35.44) vs CBUMF (14.03). CBUMF (28.163) and CARCY (27.308) have similar YTD gains . CBUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13B vs. CARCY (3.82B). CBUMF has higher revenues than CARCY: CBUMF (191B) vs CARCY (23B).
CARCYCBUMFCARCY / CBUMF
Capitalization1.7B5.33B32%
EBITDA3.82B13B29%
Gain YTD27.30828.16397%
P/E Ratio35.4414.03253%
Revenue23B191B12%
Total CashN/A31.3B-
Total DebtN/A201B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARCY vs CBUMF: Fundamental Ratings
CARCY
CBUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4638
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CARCY (15). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CARCY (100). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CARCY (100). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

CARCY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMF (45). This means that CARCY’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CARCY (9). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARCYCBUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLOZX8.890.01
+0.11%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Z
FSEAX60.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Asia
ANWPX71.12N/A
N/A
American Funds New Perspective A
FEQZX14.22N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Hedged Equity Fund Z
FTQGX39.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Focused Stock

CARCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CARCY and AHCHF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CARCY and AHCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARCY
1D Price
Change %
CARCY100%
N/A
AHCHF - CARCY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMY - CARCY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMF - CARCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHCHY - CARCY
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
TGLS - CARCY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and CBUMY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and CBUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - CBUMF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZZUY - CBUMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLS - CBUMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHCHY - CBUMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
More