CARG vs KIND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a Hold and KIND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKIND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CARG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIND’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- KIND’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CARG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +6.27% price change this week, while KIND (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +2.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARG is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
KIND is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.91% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Internet Software/Services (+3.39% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| CARG | KIND | CARG / KIND | |
| Capitalization | 2.47B | 886M | 279% |
| EBITDA | 81.1M | -166.52M | -49% |
| Gain YTD | 3.421 | 2.110 | 162% |
| P/E Ratio | 121.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 914M | 218M | 419% |
| Total Cash | 312M | 531M | 59% |
| Total Debt | 194M | 66.6M | 291% |
CARG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CARG | KIND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | N/A |
CARG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARG has been loosely correlated with MAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARG jumps, then MAX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARG | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| MAX - CARG | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| ZG - CARG | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CPRT - CARG | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| Z - CARG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| FVRR - CARG | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
KIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIND has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KIND jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIND | 100% | +1.26% | ||
| CARG - KIND | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| SMWB - KIND | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| ZG - KIND | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| Z - KIND | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| SEAT - KIND | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||