CART
Price
$43.13
Change
-$0.42 (-0.96%)
Updated
Jun 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.25B
55 days until earnings call
QVCGA
Price
$3.18
Change
+$0.12 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jun 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.53M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CART vs QVCGA

Header iconCART vs QVCGA Comparison
Open Charts CART vs QVCGABanner chart's image
Maplebear
Price$43.13
Change-$0.42 (-0.96%)
Volume$57.03K
Capitalization11.25B
QVC Group
Price$3.18
Change+$0.12 (+3.92%)
Volume$816
Capitalization32.53M
CART vs QVCGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CART vs. QVCGA commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CART is a StrongBuy and QVCGA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CART: $43.55 vs. QVCGA: $3.06)
Brand notoriety: CART and QVCGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CART: 92% vs. QVCGA: 97%
Market capitalization -- CART: $11.25B vs. QVCGA: $32.53M
CART [@Internet Retail] is valued at $11.25B. QVCGA’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $32.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.26T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $44.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CART’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQVCGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CART’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QVCGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CART is a better buy in the long-term than QVCGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CART’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QVCGA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CART’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QVCGA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QVCGA is a better buy in the short-term than CART.

Price Growth

CART (@Internet Retail) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while QVCGA (@Internet Retail) price change was -9.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CART is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

QVCGA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+0.63% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CART($11.2B) has a higher market cap than QVCGA($32.5M). CART YTD gains are higher at: 5.142 vs. QVCGA (-81.455). CART has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 529M vs. QVCGA (-576M). CART has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. QVCGA (833M). CART has less debt than QVCGA: CART (22M) vs QVCGA (5.59B). QVCGA has higher revenues than CART: QVCGA (9.8B) vs CART (3.46B).
CARTQVCGACART / QVCGA
Capitalization11.2B32.5M34,462%
EBITDA529M-576M-92%
Gain YTD5.142-81.455-6%
P/E Ratio28.38N/A-
Revenue3.46B9.8B35%
Total Cash1.63B833M196%
Total Debt22M5.59B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CART vs QVCGA: Fundamental Ratings
CART
QVCGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
5897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4997
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QVCGA's Valuation (39) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as CART (71) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that QVCGA’s stock grew similarly to CART’s over the last 12 months.

CART's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QVCGA (100) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew significantly faster than QVCGA’s over the last 12 months.

CART's SMR Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QVCGA (97) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than QVCGA’s over the last 12 months.

CART's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QVCGA (97) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than QVCGA’s over the last 12 months.

CART's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as QVCGA (9) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew similarly to QVCGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARTQVCGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYO2.75-0.04
-1.43%
Myomo
QGEN46.55-0.90
-1.90%
Qiagen N.V.
LGCY9.65-0.37
-3.69%
Legacy Education Inc.
NAMS18.49-1.26
-6.38%
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
DNA8.55-0.62
-6.76%
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings

CART and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CART and DASH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CART and DASH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CART
1D Price
Change %
CART100%
-0.73%
DASH - CART
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
RVLV - CART
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
SE - CART
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
QVCGP - CART
26%
Poorly correlated
-14.02%
AMZN - CART
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More

QVCGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVCGA has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QVCGA jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGA
1D Price
Change %
QVCGA100%
-5.56%
CVNA - QVCGA
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
QVCGP - QVCGA
31%
Poorly correlated
-14.02%
JFBR - QVCGA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
ZLNDY - QVCGA
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.22%
AMZN - QVCGA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More