CART
Price
$39.09
Change
-$0.56 (-1.41%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.45B
27 days until earnings call
QVCGP
Price
$6.31
Change
-$0.10 (-1.56%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CART vs QVCGP

Header iconCART vs QVCGP Comparison
Open Charts CART vs QVCGPBanner chart's image
Maplebear
Price$39.09
Change-$0.56 (-1.41%)
Volume$57.73K
Capitalization10.45B
QVC Group
Price$6.31
Change-$0.10 (-1.56%)
Volume$197
CapitalizationN/A
CART vs QVCGP Comparison Chart in %
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CART vs. QVCGP commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CART is a StrongBuy and QVCGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (CART: $39.09 vs. QVCGP: $6.39)
Brand notoriety: CART and QVCGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CART: 50% vs. QVCGP: 52%
Market capitalization -- CART: $10.45B vs. QVCGP: $0
CART [@Internet Retail] is valued at $10.45B. QVCGP’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.4T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CART’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQVCGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CART’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QVCGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CART is a better buy in the long-term than QVCGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CART’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QVCGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CART’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QVCGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CART is a better buy in the short-term than QVCGP.

Price Growth

CART (@Internet Retail) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while QVCGP (@Internet Retail) price change was -10.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +181.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CART is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-1.10% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CART YTD gains are higher at: -4.273 vs. QVCGP (-80.392). CART has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 610M vs. QVCGP (-3.03B). CART has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. QVCGP (897M). CART has less debt than QVCGP: CART (37M) vs QVCGP (5.51B). QVCGP has higher revenues than CART: QVCGP (9.63B) vs CART (3.55B).
CARTQVCGPCART / QVCGP
Capitalization10.4BN/A-
EBITDA610M-3.03B-20%
Gain YTD-4.273-80.3925%
P/E Ratio22.60N/A-
Revenue3.55B9.63B37%
Total Cash1.6B897M178%
Total Debt37M5.51B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CART: Fundamental Ratings
CART
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARTQVCGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMU35.573.06
+9.41%
T-Rex 2X Long ARM Daily Target ETF
LGI17.660.08
+0.46%
Lazard Global Total Return & Income Fund
CCMG31.210.07
+0.23%
CCM Global Equity ETF
GJR24.76N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed Income Securities
XFLX24.44-0.01
-0.02%
FundX Flexible ETF

QVCGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QVCGP and QVCGA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVCGP and QVCGA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGP
1D Price
Change %
QVCGP100%
+1.10%
QVCGA - QVCGP
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
MELI - QVCGP
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
AMZN - QVCGP
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
JFBR - QVCGP
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.80%
W - QVCGP
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More