CASH
Price
$78.17
Change
-$2.54 (-3.15%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
62 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$54.54
Change
-$1.90 (-3.37%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
4B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs HWC

Header iconCASH vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CASH vs HWCBanner chart's image
Pathward Financial
Price$78.17
Change-$2.54 (-3.15%)
Volume$105.15K
Capitalization1.29B
Hancock Whitney
Price$54.54
Change-$1.90 (-3.37%)
Volume$367.11K
Capitalization4B
CASH vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASH vs. HWC commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a Buy and HWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CASH: $78.17 vs. HWC: $54.54)
Brand notoriety: CASH and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 47% vs. HWC: 46%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.29B vs. HWC: $4B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.29B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.29B). HWC has higher P/E ratio than CASH: HWC (9.98) vs CASH (8.25). CASH YTD gains are higher at: 6.313 vs. HWC (0.501). CASH has less debt than HWC: CASH (33.6M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than CASH: HWC (1.37B) vs CASH (588M).
CASHHWCCASH / HWC
Capitalization1.29B4B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.3130.5011,260%
P/E Ratio8.259.9883%
Revenue588M1.37B43%
Total CashN/A561M-
Total Debt33.6M1.52B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2023
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (94) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGDRX28.86N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
PEQIX24.39N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equity Income A
TSTFX19.50N/A
N/A
Transamerica Stock Index R4
VEITX14.95N/A
N/A
VELA International I
MRSAX25.13-0.23
-0.91%
MFS Research International A