Advertisement
CASS vs DCMDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a Hold and DCMDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CASS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDCMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CASS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DCMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CASS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CASS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DCMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CASS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while DCMDF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
CASS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.89% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CASS | DCMDF | CASS / DCMDF | |
| Capitalization | 524M | 58.1M | 902% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 57.6M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.001 | -28.063 | -0% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.72 | 12.77 | 154% |
| Revenue | 192M | 462M | 42% |
| Total Cash | 5.1M | 2.89M | 177% |
| Total Debt | 0 | 264M | - |
CASS | DCMDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DCMDF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CASS (93) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DCMDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CASS’s over the last 12 months.
DCMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CASS (79) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DCMDF’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's SMR Rating (46) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DCMDF (48) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DCMDF (62) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DCMDF (96) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
| CASS | DCMDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
CASS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CASS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASS | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| GHC - CASS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| BRC - CASS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| FC - CASS | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| RGP - CASS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| AZZ - CASS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
DCMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCMDF and YUMM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCMDF and YUMM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCMDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| YUMM - DCMDF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CASS - DCMDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| UDMY - DCMDF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ESTTF - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KSCP - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.47% | ||
More | ||||