CASS vs DCMDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a Hold and DCMDF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CASS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDCMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CASS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- DCMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CASS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CASS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- DCMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CASS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while DCMDF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
CASS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.34% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| CASS | DCMDF | CASS / DCMDF | |
| Capitalization | 657M | 129M | 509% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 28.2M | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.153 | -23.077 | 18% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.76 | 20.28 | 107% |
| Revenue | 187M | 281M | 67% |
| Total Cash | 20.9M | 2.99M | 698% |
| Total Debt | 0 | 61.7M | - |
CASS | DCMDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DCMDF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CASS (93) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DCMDF’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.
DCMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that DCMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASS’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's SMR Rating (40) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCMDF (91) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DCMDF (61) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as DCMDF (30) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to DCMDF’s over the last 12 months.
| CASS | DCMDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% | 25 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 7 days ago 76% |
CASS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CASS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASS | 100% | -4.26% | ||
| GHC - CASS | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
| RGP - CASS | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| FORR - CASS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| UNF - CASS | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| EXPO - CASS | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
More | ||||
DCMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCMDF and YUMM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCMDF and YUMM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCMDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| YUMM - DCMDF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CASS - DCMDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
| UDMY - DCMDF | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| ESTTF - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KSCP - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | -7.09% | ||
More | ||||