CASS
Price
$42.02
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
555.07M
29 days until earnings call
FC
Price
$19.28
Change
-$0.19 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
243.86M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASS vs FC

Header iconCASS vs FC Comparison
Open Charts CASS vs FCBanner chart's image
Cass Information Systems
Price$42.02
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization555.07M
Franklin Covey
Price$19.28
Change-$0.19 (-0.98%)
Volume$220
Capitalization243.86M
CASS vs FC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASS vs. FC commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a Hold and FC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CASS: $42.00 vs. FC: $19.47)
Brand notoriety: CASS and FC are both not notable
CASS represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while FC is part of the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASS: 71% vs. FC: 43%
Market capitalization -- CASS: $555.07M vs. FC: $243.86M
CASS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $555.07M. FC’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $243.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CASS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASS is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than CASS.

Price Growth

CASS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -1.48% price change this week, while FC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +3.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.39%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.67% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Other Consumer Specialties (+3.37% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASS($555M) has a higher market cap than FC($244M). CASS has higher P/E ratio than FC: CASS (26.65) vs FC (24.42). CASS YTD gains are higher at: 5.146 vs. FC (-48.670). FC has more cash in the bank: 33.7M vs. CASS (5.1M). CASS has less debt than FC: CASS (0) vs FC (2.35M). FC has higher revenues than CASS: FC (280M) vs CASS (192M).
CASSFCCASS / FC
Capitalization555M244M227%
EBITDAN/A25.6M-
Gain YTD5.146-48.670-11%
P/E Ratio26.6524.42109%
Revenue192M280M69%
Total Cash5.1M33.7M15%
Total Debt02.35M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASS vs FC: Fundamental Ratings
CASS
FC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
683
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
4754
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5787
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2470
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FC's Valuation (85) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CASS (92) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's SMR Rating (47) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FC (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FC (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (70) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASSFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGSIX70.28N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth IS
WIFMX3.94N/A
N/A
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
FTVSX34.36N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
WDIAX14.57N/A
N/A
Wilmington Enhanced Div Inc Strat A
JACAX59.28-0.38
-0.64%
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Instl

CASS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASS
1D Price
Change %
CASS100%
+0.24%
GHC - CASS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
BRC - CASS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
FC - CASS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
RGP - CASS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
AZZ - CASS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
More

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-0.92%
RGP - FC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
GHC - FC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CASS - FC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
AZZ - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
MSA - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More