CASS
Price
$41.06
Change
+$0.41 (+1.01%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
656.64M
83 days until earnings call
GRNQ
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Updated
Apr 24, 01:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.6M
Ad is loading...

CASS vs GRNQ

Header iconCASS vs GRNQ Comparison
Open Charts CASS vs GRNQBanner chart's image
Cass Information Systems
Price$41.06
Change+$0.41 (+1.01%)
Volume$47.23K
Capitalization656.64M
Greenpro Capital
Price$0.89
Change-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Volume$210
Capitalization10.6M
CASS vs GRNQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASS vs. GRNQ commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a Buy and GRNQ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CASS: $41.06 vs. GRNQ: $0.91)
Brand notoriety: CASS and GRNQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASS: 112% vs. GRNQ: 14%
Market capitalization -- CASS: $656.64M vs. GRNQ: $10.6M
CASS [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $656.64M. GRNQ’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $10.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRNQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GRNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASS is a better buy in the long-term than GRNQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRNQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASS is a better buy in the short-term than GRNQ.

Price Growth

CASS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while GRNQ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

GRNQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+4.87% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASS($657M) has a higher market cap than GRNQ($10.6M). CASS has higher P/E ratio than GRNQ: CASS (21.76) vs GRNQ (3.86). CASS YTD gains are higher at: 1.073 vs. GRNQ (-16.216). CASS has more cash in the bank: 20.9M vs. GRNQ (2.5M). CASS has less debt than GRNQ: CASS (0) vs GRNQ (155K). CASS has higher revenues than GRNQ: CASS (187M) vs GRNQ (3.29M).
CASSGRNQCASS / GRNQ
Capitalization657M10.6M6,198%
EBITDAN/A2.96M-
Gain YTD1.073-16.216-7%
P/E Ratio21.763.86564%
Revenue187M3.29M5,679%
Total Cash20.9M2.5M838%
Total Debt0155K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASS vs GRNQ: Fundamental Ratings
CASS
GRNQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
1595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CASS's Valuation (94) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as GRNQ (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRNQ (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's SMR Rating (15) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRNQ (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew significantly faster than GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.

GRNQ's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CASS (71) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.

GRNQ's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CASS (15) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASSGRNQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZSCX10.410.25
+2.46%
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
CBALX48.68N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced Inst
MNDGX13.03N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery R1
GURPX30.98N/A
N/A
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate P
CSEYX18.14N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst3

CASS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASS
1D Price
Change %
CASS100%
+1.01%
GHC - CASS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
RGP - CASS
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
MSA - CASS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
LOPE - CASS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
AZZ - CASS
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
More

GRNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNQ and SMX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNQ and SMX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNQ
1D Price
Change %
GRNQ100%
N/A
SMX - GRNQ
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.44%
REZI - GRNQ
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
ADT - GRNQ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
RGP - GRNQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CASS - GRNQ
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More