CASXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.82M
FPRGF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.07 (+43.75%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
70.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASXF vs FPRGF

Header iconCASXF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization3.82M
Falco Resources
Price$0.23
Change+$0.07 (+43.75%)
Volume$18.74K
Capitalization70.32M
CASXF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. FPRGF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.05 vs. FPRGF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 86% vs. FPRGF: 81%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.82M vs. FPRGF: $70.32M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.82M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $70.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASXF is a better buy in the long-term than FPRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the short-term than CASXF.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +21.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($70.3M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.82M). CASXF YTD gains are higher at: 28.121 vs. FPRGF (21.053). FPRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 266K vs. CASXF (-184.09K). FPRGF has more cash in the bank: 2.79M vs. CASXF (258K). CASXF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CASXFFPRGFCASXF / FPRGF
Capitalization3.82M70.3M5%
EBITDA-184.09K266K-69%
Gain YTD28.12121.053134%
P/E RatioN/A31.83-
Revenue00-
Total Cash258K2.79M9%
Total DebtN/A36.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASXF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
CASXF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9589
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CASXF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPRGF (73). This means that CASXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

CASXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (100). This means that CASXF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CASXF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CASXF’s over the last 12 months.

CASXF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (64). This means that CASXF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CASXF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CASXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASXFFPRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWX2.630.06
+2.18%
Avalon Holdings Corp
KROS15.800.05
+0.32%
Keros Therapeutics
BNT68.46-1.26
-1.81%
Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd
APLS22.22-0.54
-2.37%
Apellis Pharmaceuticals
RRGB6.74-0.21
-3.02%
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CASXF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASXF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - CASXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
FPRGF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXREF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATBHF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More