CASXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.33M
FPRGF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASXF vs FPRGF

Header iconCASXF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$7.3K
Capitalization3.33M
Falco Resources
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization33.8M
CASXF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. FPRGF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.05 vs. FPRGF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 48% vs. FPRGF: 47%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.33M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.33M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASXF is a better buy in the long-term than FPRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the short-term than CASXF.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.33M). CASXF YTD gains are higher at: 38.765 vs. FPRGF (-3.684). CASXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -413.7K vs. FPRGF (-2.32M). FPRGF has more cash in the bank: 6.78M vs. CASXF (410K). CASXF has less debt than FPRGF: CASXF (40K) vs FPRGF (32.3M). CASXF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CASXFFPRGFCASXF / FPRGF
Capitalization3.33M33.8M10%
EBITDA-413.7K-2.32M18%
Gain YTD38.765-3.684-1,052%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash410K6.78M6%
Total Debt40K32.3M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASXF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
CASXF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CASXF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (68). This means that CASXF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

CASXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (100). This means that CASXF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CASXF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CASXF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CASXF (49). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CASXF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASXF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASXFFPRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLBXF1.000.03
+3.27%
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.
DNFGF0.52N/A
N/A
Dongfeng Motor Group Co., Ltd.
GWTR0.03N/A
N/A
Global Water Technologies, Inc.
PGINF4.16N/A
N/A
Prestige International Inc.
POAHY3.96-0.01
-0.25%
Porsche Automobile Holding SE

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CASXF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASXF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - CASXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
FPRGF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXREF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More