Ad is loading...
CASXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
FPRGF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CASXF vs FPRGF

Header iconCASXF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$119K
CapitalizationN/A
Falco Resources
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$39.28K
CapitalizationN/A
CASXF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. FPRGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.03 vs. FPRGF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 552% vs. FPRGF: 646%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.33M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.33M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the long-term than CASXF.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.96% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +20.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.33M). FPRGF YTD gains are higher at: 253.059 vs. CASXF (-19.603). CASXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -413.7K vs. FPRGF (-2.32M). FPRGF has more cash in the bank: 6.78M vs. CASXF (410K). CASXF has less debt than FPRGF: CASXF (40K) vs FPRGF (32.3M). CASXF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CASXFFPRGFCASXF / FPRGF
Capitalization3.33M33.8M10%
EBITDA-413.7K-2.32M18%
Gain YTD-19.603253.059-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash410K6.78M6%
Total Debt40K32.3M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCIT80.890.07
+0.09%
Vanguard Interm-Term Corp Bd ETF
MTUL31.18N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mntm Fctr TR ETN
FLMX24.73-0.23
-0.92%
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
USPX51.37-0.67
-1.28%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF
LSGR37.80-0.81
-2.10%
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CASXF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASXF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - CASXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.96%
FPRGF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.73%
AXREF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPRGF has been loosely correlated with PXMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPRGF jumps, then PXMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
+8.73%
PXMFF - FPRGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More