CASXF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.33M
LITM
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.06 (-11.54%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.32M
Ad is loading...

CASXF vs LITM

Header iconCASXF vs LITM Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs LITMBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization3.33M
Snow Lake Resources
Price$0.46
Change-$0.06 (-11.54%)
Volume$3.92M
Capitalization20.32M
CASXF vs LITM Comparison Chart
Loading...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. LITM commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and LITM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.05 vs. LITM: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and LITM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 1% vs. LITM: 29%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.33M vs. LITM: $20.32M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.33M. LITM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CASXF and LITM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LITM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +29.58% price change this week, while LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -20.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITM($20.3M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.33M). CASXF YTD gains are higher at: -1.235 vs. LITM (-51.813). CASXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -413.7K vs. LITM (-2.56M). LITM has more cash in the bank: 30.8M vs. CASXF (410K). CASXF has less debt than LITM: CASXF (40K) vs LITM (782K). CASXF (0) and LITM (0) have equivalent revenues.
CASXFLITMCASXF / LITM
Capitalization3.33M20.3M16%
EBITDA-413.7K-2.56M16%
Gain YTD-1.235-51.8132%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash410K30.8M1%
Total Debt40K782K5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASXF: Fundamental Ratings
CASXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLGC0.50-0.04
-6.90%
Flora Growth Corp
STNG34.39-3.04
-8.12%
Scorpio Tankers
CVGI1.15-0.13
-10.16%
Commercial Vehicle Group
LC9.43-1.30
-12.12%
LendingClub Corp
TRGP180.72-25.00
-12.15%
Targa Resources Corp

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CASXF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASXF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - CASXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
FPRGF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.79%
AXREF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More