Ad is loading...
CASXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
OMHLF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

CASXF vs OMHLF

Header iconCASXF vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$119K
CapitalizationN/A
OM Holdings
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.5K
CapitalizationN/A
CASXF vs OMHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. OMHLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and OMHLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.03 vs. OMHLF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 552% vs. OMHLF: 177%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.33M vs. OMHLF: $268.11M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.33M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $268.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than CASXF.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.96% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($268M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.33M). CASXF YTD gains are higher at: -19.603 vs. OMHLF (-23.721). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 191M vs. CASXF (-413.7K). OMHLF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. CASXF (410K). CASXF has less debt than OMHLF: CASXF (40K) vs OMHLF (417M). OMHLF has higher revenues than CASXF: OMHLF (883M) vs CASXF (0).
CASXFOMHLFCASXF / OMHLF
Capitalization3.33M268M1%
EBITDA-413.7K191M-0%
Gain YTD-19.603-23.72183%
P/E RatioN/A4.42-
Revenue0883M-
Total Cash410K112M0%
Total Debt40K417M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCHX1.700.04
+2.41%
Marchex
WTFC131.760.81
+0.62%
Wintrust Financial Corp
UBS31.63-0.05
-0.16%
UBS Group AG
IAG4.94-0.04
-0.80%
IAMGold Corp
RMR22.19-0.33
-1.47%
RMR Group (The)

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CASXF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASXF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - CASXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.96%
FPRGF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.73%
AXREF - CASXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATCUF - OMHLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.47%
CRUCF - OMHLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGHPF - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More