CATH vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATH is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CATH | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 14 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 75% | 18 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 48% |
CATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATH | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| CDNS - CATH | 70% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| TER - CATH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| LRCX - CATH | 69% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| KLAC - CATH | 69% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNPS - CATH | 69% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +2.11% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 86% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.17% | ||
More | ||||