CATY
Price
$43.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
33 days until earnings call
CLST
Price
$10.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CATY vs CLST

Header iconCATY vs CLST Comparison
Open Charts CATY vs CLSTBanner chart's image
Cathay General Ban
Price$43.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$286.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Catalyst Ban
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CATY vs CLST Comparison Chart
Loading...
CATY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CATY vs. CLST commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a StrongBuy and CLST is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CATY: $43.04 vs. CLST: $10.87)
Brand notoriety: CATY and CLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 90% vs. CLST: 115%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $2.75B vs. CLST: $53.99M
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.75B. CLST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CATY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while CLST (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2024.

CLST is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CATY($2.75B) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than CATY: CLST (84.57) vs CATY (7.60). CLST YTD gains are higher at: 0.277 vs. CATY (-0.892). CATY has higher revenues than CLST: CATY (810M) vs CLST (9.14M).
CATYCLSTCATY / CLST
Capitalization2.75B54M5,091%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.8920.277-322%
P/E Ratio7.6084.579%
Revenue810M9.14M8,862%
Total Cash146MN/A-
Total Debt710MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs CLST: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
CLST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3610
SMR RATING
1..100
1291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4674
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CATY's Valuation (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (96) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CATY (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (91) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (74) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (81) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CATY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACWEX13.160.13
+1.00%
Cavanal Hill World Energy C
SPVYX26.380.21
+0.80%
SEI Small Cap Value Y (SIMT)
NDVIX19.120.08
+0.42%
MFS New Discovery Value I
VYCFX24.91N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R
AMRMX58.62-0.12
-0.20%
American Funds American Mutual A

CATY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATY has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATY jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CATY
1D Price
Change %
CATY100%
+0.54%
SSB - CATY
86%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
ABCB - CATY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
UCB - CATY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
AUB - CATY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
UBSI - CATY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLST and WSBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLST and WSBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
-1.00%
WSBC - CLST
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
CHMG - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
BMRC - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
PPBI - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
CATY - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More