CATY
Price
$63.03
Change
-$0.21 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UCB
Price
$35.29
Change
-$0.30 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs UCB

CATY vs UCB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) vs. United Community Banks (UCB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is a Los Angeles-based regional bank with a strong West Coast and Asian-American community focus, while United Community Banks (UCB) operates primarily across the Southeastern United States, anchored by a growing Georgia and Carolinas footprint.
  • CATY has delivered notably stronger price momentum in 2026, with its stock near a 52-week high, while UCB has posted more modest gains amid a complex strategic transformation involving a major business divestiture.
  • Both regional banks reported solid second-quarter 2026 earnings, yet CATY's higher efficiency ratio (approximately 41.5%) and expanding net interest margin signal stronger operating leverage relative to UCB's operating efficiency ratio of roughly 56.7%.
  • UCB is navigating a pivotal period with the pending sale of its Navitas equipment finance unit and the acquisition of Peach State Bank, creating near-term uncertainty but potentially sharpening its core banking focus.
  • CATY offers a lower P/E ratio (approximately 12.3 vs. 13.3) and a more mature capital return program including an increased share buyback authorization, while UCB provides a higher dividend yield (2.8% vs. 2.4%).
  • Institutional ownership is higher for UCB (82.3%) than CATY (75.0%), though both enjoy strong institutional support reflective of their positions within the regional banking sector.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a distinctive niche in the U.S. financial landscape, blending community-oriented relationship banking with the scale to serve commercial and institutional clients. Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and United Community Banks (UCB) represent two compelling yet distinct expressions of this model — one rooted in the Asian-American communities of the West Coast, the other in the fast-growing Sun Belt markets of the Southeast. For investors evaluating regional bank stocks, the comparison between these two institutions offers a useful lens into how geographic focus, strategic positioning, and operational execution can shape relative performance. This article examines both banks across multiple dimensions to help traders and investors assess their respective market positioning in the current environment.

CATY Overview and Recent Performance

Cathay General Bancorp is the holding company for Cathay Bank, one of the largest Asian-American banks in the United States. Founded in 1962 and headquartered in Los Angeles, California, the institution operates over 60 branches across nine states plus international offices in Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, and Taipei. Its business model emphasizes commercial lending, trade finance, and relationship banking tailored to both domestic and cross-border clients.

In recent market activity, CATY has demonstrated robust momentum. The stock has posted a year-to-date gain exceeding 30% through mid-2026, trading near its 52-week high. The company reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $92.2 million, or $1.37 per diluted share, exceeding analyst consensus estimates of $1.35. Revenue for the quarter reached $221.2 million, representing a 13.1% year-over-year increase. Notably, the bank's net interest margin (NIM) — a key profitability metric that measures the difference between interest income earned and interest paid out — expanded to 3.48%, up from 3.43% in the prior quarter. Total loans grew to $20.62 billion, while total deposits reached $21.06 billion. The company's efficiency ratio of approximately 41.5% ranks among the strongest in the regional banking space, indicating disciplined cost management. Additionally, CATY's Board increased its share repurchase authorization from $150 million to $200 million, signaling confidence in the bank's capital position.

UCB Overview and Recent Performance

United Community Banks, Inc., headquartered in Blairsville, Georgia, with executive offices in Greenville, South Carolina, operates through its subsidiary United Community Bank. The institution provides a broad suite of banking services — including commercial and consumer lending, mortgage origination, treasury management, and wealth management — across the high-growth Southeastern United States. The bank specializes in commercial real estate financing, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and agricultural lending.

In recent weeks, UCB has been navigating a strategically important transition. The company reported second-quarter 2026 GAAP earnings of $0.95 per share, boosted by a $38.5 million reserve release tied to the reclassification of Navitas equipment finance loans as held-for-sale. On an operating basis, earnings were $0.71 per share, up 8% year-over-year, though slightly below consensus. Total revenue increased 7% to $279.3 million. The bank's NIM reached 3.68%, marking its sixth consecutive quarter of margin expansion. Organic loan growth, excluding Navitas, accelerated to 6.4% annualized, supported by a 17% expansion of the bank's revenue-producing sales force since September 2025. UCB is simultaneously executing two transformative transactions: the sale of its Navitas equipment finance business and the acquisition of Peach State Bank, both expected to close in the third quarter of 2026. These moves are designed to refocus the bank on its core Southeastern franchise while optimizing the balance sheet.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page provides a curated gateway into AI-powered trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each engineered with distinct trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from high-frequency 5-minute agents to longer-duration swing-trading models covering thousands of tickers across equities, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies. Only the most adaptable and best-performing robots for current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. Performance metrics among these featured bots span a broad spectrum: top performers have demonstrated annualized returns ranging from approximately 78% to well over 500% in certain volatile periods, with some maintaining 100% win rates over consecutive closed trades and Sharpe ratios exceeding 2.0. Whether a trader favors conservative capital-preservation strategies or aggressive momentum-based approaches, the Trending AI Robots section offers a transparent, statistics-rich starting point for exploring how artificial intelligence can augment trading decisions. Explore the full selection at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, CATY and UCB reveal meaningful contrasts across several key dimensions:

Geographic Footprint and Business Model: CATY's franchise is concentrated on the West Coast with a unique cross-border banking angle serving Asian-American communities and transpacific trade. UCB is anchored in the Southeastern U.S., one of the country's fastest-growing regions demographically, and is sharpening its focus on core community and commercial banking after divesting its equipment finance arm.

Profitability and Efficiency: CATY holds a clear advantage in operating efficiency, with an efficiency ratio near 41.5% compared to UCB's roughly 56.7%. This suggests CATY generates more revenue per dollar of expense. However, UCB's NIM of 3.68% tops CATY's 3.48%, reflecting stronger pricing power on its loan portfolio.

Momentum and Valuation: CATY has delivered stronger price appreciation in 2026, with shares up more than 30% year-to-date, while UCB has risen roughly 15%. On valuation, CATY's lower P/E ratio (approximately 12.3 vs. 13.3) and aggressive buyback activity may appeal to value-oriented investors, whereas UCB's higher dividend yield (2.8% vs. 2.4%) and "Moderate Buy" consensus rating (versus CATY's "Hold" consensus) signal that analysts see more near-term upside potential in UCB.

Risk Factors: CATY faces concentration risk tied to California's economy and exposure to commercial real estate in West Coast markets. UCB confronts execution risk surrounding its simultaneous Navitas divestiture and Peach State integration, and the Navitas sale is expected to reduce NIM by 20–30 basis points in the near term. Both banks maintain strong capital ratios, with UCB's CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1, a measure of a bank's core capital strength) at 13.5% and CATY's capital position also solid.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable technical and fundamental factors, Tickeron's AI would likely express a modest preference for CATY in the current environment. The rationale centers on trend consistency: CATY's price has maintained a steady upward trajectory with less volatility, supported by consecutive quarters of NIM expansion, stronger operating efficiency, and proactive capital management through share buybacks. The stock's lower beta (0.86, meaning it tends to move less dramatically than the broader market) and cleaner near-term strategic outlook reduce the probability of sudden negative catalysts. UCB, by contrast, is navigating a period of strategic recalibration. While the long-term thesis of a refocused Southeastern franchise is compelling, the overlapping transactions introduce near-term uncertainty that an AI model would likely weigh as a risk factor. That said, UCB's superior NIM trajectory and accelerating organic loan growth provide a foundation that could shift relative positioning once the Navitas and Peach State transactions are fully absorbed. In probabilistic terms, CATY's combination of operational consistency, return on assets (ROA) exceeding 1.5%, and favorable relative momentum gives it a marginal edge under current market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CATY vs. UCB commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a StrongBuy and UCB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $63.03 vs. UCB: $35.29)
Brand notoriety: CATY and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 47% vs. UCB: 130%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $4.21B vs. UCB: $4.23B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.21B. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($4.23B) and CATY($4.21B) have the same market capitalization . CATY has higher P/E ratio than UCB: CATY (12.34) vs UCB (11.53). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 32.076 vs. UCB (14.810). UCB has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. CATY (146M). UCB has less debt than CATY: UCB (120M) vs CATY (169M). UCB has higher revenues than CATY: UCB (1.07B) vs CATY (845M).
CATYUCBCATY / UCB
Capitalization4.21B4.23B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.07614.810217%
P/E Ratio12.3411.53107%
Revenue845M1.07B79%
Total Cash146M177M82%
Total Debt169M120M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2881
SMR RATING
1..100
3228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3769
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCB's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (63). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (81). This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (32). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (48). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (69). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTPE59.731.41
+2.42%
Goldman Sachs MSCI Wld Priv Eq RtTrkrETF
QMFE24.040.29
+1.21%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Feb
VGM10.190.04
+0.39%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals
BLV66.290.06
+0.09%
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
OPER100.03N/A
N/A
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
-0.84%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
CATY - UCB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
AUB - UCB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
FULT - UCB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
SFNC - UCB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More