AUB
Price
$42.88
Change
+$0.22 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.12B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CATY
Price
$64.93
Change
+$0.32 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.33B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs CATY

AUB vs CATY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB) vs. Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AUB and CATY are both U.S. regional banks, but they serve fundamentally different geographic footprints and customer demographics.
  • Atlantic Union Bankshares operates primarily across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, while Cathay General Bancorp focuses on the Chinese-American community primarily in California and other gateway markets.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks navigating the same macro environment of elevated interest rates and credit quality scrutiny, though their loan portfolio compositions create distinct risk profiles.
  • CATY carries a larger commercial real estate (CRE) concentration, a sector under heightened investor vigilance, while AUB's more diversified lending base may offer different stability characteristics.
  • Both institutions reported solid capital ratios in recent quarters, but profitability metrics and efficiency ratios diverge in ways that matter to value-focused investors.
  • AI-driven analysis from platforms like Tickeron evaluates these two stocks across trend strength, volatility patterns, and signal consistency to identify which one currently aligns better with prevailing market conditions.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a critical space in the U.S. financial system, and comparing two mid-sized institutions like AUB (Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation) and CATY (Cathay General Bancorp) reveals meaningful contrasts in strategy, geography, and risk exposure. While both operate in the same industry and face identical macroeconomic headwinds—including a higher-for-longer interest rate environment and evolving credit conditions—their business models diverge sharply. Investors evaluating regional bank exposure, whether for income, value, or sector rotation strategies, may find this side-by-side comparison useful for understanding which institution is better positioned in the current cycle. This article examines each bank's recent performance, business context, and how AI-driven tools assess their relative standing.

AUB Overview and Recent Performance

Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, operates as the holding company for Atlantic Union Bank. With a footprint spanning Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina, AUB provides commercial banking, consumer banking, and wealth management services to a diverse customer base across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast. The bank has grown through a combination of organic expansion and strategic acquisitions, building a branch network that serves both metropolitan and community markets.

In recent weeks, AUB has traded within a relatively defined range, reflecting broader regional bank sector indecision as investors weigh interest rate expectations against credit quality trends. The bank's net interest margin (NIM—the spread between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits) has held reasonably steady, supported by disciplined deposit pricing and a loan portfolio tilted toward commercial and industrial (C&I) lending. Market participants have noted the bank's manageable exposure to commercial real estate relative to some peers, which has partially insulated it from the sector's most acute concerns. Quarterly earnings released in recent months demonstrated stable credit metrics, with nonperforming assets remaining at historically low levels. Cost control initiatives have also drawn attention, as efficiency ratio improvements signal operating leverage potential heading into the second half of the year.

CATY Overview and Recent Performance

Cathay General Bancorp, based in Los Angeles, California, is the holding company for Cathay Bank, one of the oldest and largest banks serving the Chinese-American community in the United States. With branches concentrated in California, New York, and several other states with significant Asian-American populations, CATY has carved out a distinctive niche in cross-border banking, trade finance, and commercial real estate lending focused on its core demographic.

Recent trading activity in CATY shares has reflected a tug-of-war between the bank's historically strong credit culture and market apprehension surrounding CRE concentration. Cathay's loan book carries a meaningful weighting toward commercial real estate—both owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied—which has drawn scrutiny as refinancing risk mounts in a sustained high-rate environment. Nonetheless, the bank has maintained robust capital buffers, with Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1—a key measure of a bank's core capital strength) ratios comfortably above regulatory requirements. Deposit trends have remained relatively resilient, supported by long-standing community relationships. Earnings in recent quarters have benefited from disciplined loan pricing, though provisioning for potential credit losses has edged higher, mirroring an industry-wide trend toward building reserves amid economic uncertainty. The bank's California-centric footprint also subjects it to the state's distinctive regulatory and economic dynamics.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where market-moving data arrives at machine speed, many traders are turning to AI-driven tools for signal generation and portfolio optimization. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing automated trading bots, drawn from a pool of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this featured section. Users can browse bots with varying trading styles—from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following—each with transparent performance statistics including annualized returns, trade counts, and win rates. Whether the focus is on regional bank stocks like AUB and CATY or broader sector strategies, the Trending AI Robots page offers a window into which automated strategies are navigating today's conditions most effectively. Explore the full selection to see which bots deserve a spotlight right now.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placing AUB and CATY side by side, several distinctions emerge:

Geographic and Demographic Focus: AUB serves a broad, economically diverse Mid-Atlantic and Southeast corridor with no single demographic concentration, while CATY's franchise relies heavily on the Chinese-American community and the economic health of California. This makes CATY more sensitive to U.S.-China trade relations and immigration policy, whereas AUB's risks are tied to more generalized regional economic cycles.

Loan Portfolio Composition: AUB maintains a more balanced mix across C&I lending, consumer loans, and CRE. CATY's heavier CRE tilt—particularly in multifamily and commercial properties—creates a higher sensitivity profile to the ongoing commercial property repricing. Investors pricing in a CRE-related credit cycle may apply different discount rates to each bank.

Margin and Profitability Dynamics: CATY has historically posted stronger net interest margins, partly due to its niche deposit base and loan pricing. AUB, while narrower on margin, benefits from a lower-cost deposit franchise in many of its markets. The divergence in return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE—a profitability metric measuring returns on tangible shareholder capital) between the two has narrowed in recent periods as AUB's acquisition integrations mature.

Momentum and Sentiment: Both stocks have seen choppy price action in recent months, but relative strength indicators and institutional flow data suggest a slight divergence in market sentiment, with one bank attracting more consistent accumulation than the other depending on the timeframe examined.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on the observable factors that Tickeron's AI trading models typically weigh—trend consistency, volatility-adjusted return profiles, signal frequency, and relative sector positioning—the current analysis suggests a modest preference for AUB over CATY in the prevailing market environment. This assessment is driven primarily by AUB's more diversified loan book, which reduces single-sector concentration risk compared to CATY's higher CRE exposure, as well as more favorable trend stability signals in recent weeks. CATY's niche strength and historically superior margins remain compelling attributes, but the AI's weighting toward risk-adjusted momentum tilts the balance toward AUB at this juncture. This verdict reflects probabilistic modeling rather than certainty and should be understood as one input among many in a comprehensive investment evaluation process.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
AUB vs. CATY commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a StrongBuy and CATY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $42.66 vs. CATY: $64.61)
Brand notoriety: AUB and CATY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 41% vs. CATY: 45%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $6.12B vs. CATY: $4.33B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.12B. CATY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCATY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than AUB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CATY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CATY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while CATY (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($6.12B) has a higher market cap than CATY($4.33B). CATY (12.71) and AUB (12.50) have similar P/E ratio . CATY YTD gains are higher at: 35.387 vs. AUB (24.263). AUB has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. CATY (146M). CATY has less debt than AUB: CATY (169M) vs AUB (1.16B). AUB has higher revenues than CATY: AUB (1.53B) vs CATY (845M).
AUBCATYAUB / CATY
Capitalization6.12B4.33B141%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.26335.38769%
P/E Ratio12.5012.7198%
Revenue1.53B845M181%
Total Cash451M146M309%
Total Debt1.16B169M686%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs CATY: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
CATY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7881
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6024
SMR RATING
1..100
2332
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUB's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CATY (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUB (60) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CATY (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (46) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUB (82) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBCATY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIGG26.014.86
+22.97%
Leverage Shares 2x Long FIG Daily ETF
VFVA162.482.06
+1.28%
Vanguard US Value Factor ETF
QVOY29.920.08
+0.25%
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
VEU85.710.17
+0.20%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US ETF
DBO20.70-0.29
-1.38%
Invesco DB Oil

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
+0.52%
UBSI - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
UCB - AUB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
FULT - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
CATY - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
SSB - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More