CATY
Price
$63.19
Change
+$0.16 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.22B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOPE
Price
$14.01
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs HOPE

CATY vs HOPE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) vs. Hope Bancorp (HOPE) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) delivered a net margin of 23.79% and a return on equity (ROE — a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital) of 11.37% in its most recent trailing twelve months, far outpacing Hope Bancorp (HOPE">HOPE) on both profitability metrics.
  • HOPE is navigating a transformative integration following its April 2025 acquisition of Territorial Bancorp, which expanded its footprint into Hawaii but has weighed on reported GAAP earnings.
  • CATY trades at a significantly lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 12.8 versus HOPE's roughly 26.9, suggesting CATY offers a more compressed valuation relative to current earnings.
  • HOPE offers a higher dividend yield of roughly 4.0%, though its payout ratio exceeds 100% of reported earnings, raising questions about long-term dividend sustainability.
  • Both stocks are up sharply year-to-date — CATY by roughly 32% and HOPE by approximately 25% — reflecting a broader rotation into regional bank names as Q2 2026 earnings season unfolds.
  • Analyst consensus rates CATY as a "Hold" with an average price target near $64.80, while HOPE carries a consensus target of around $14.50, implying moderate upside for both from late-July 2026 levels.

Introduction

Regional banks remain a focal point for investors seeking exposure to the U.S. credit cycle, interest rate normalization, and community-level economic strength. CATY and HOPE — both headquartered in Los Angeles and both serving multicultural communities across the United States — offer two distinct case studies within the regional banking landscape. This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance, profitability profiles, growth catalysts, and risk factors, providing a data-driven framework for traders and investors navigating the mid-cap and small-cap bank sectors. Whether you prioritize earnings quality, dividend income, turnaround potential, or valuation discipline, understanding how these two institutions diverge is essential to making an informed assessment.

CATY Overview and Recent Performance

Cathay General Bancorp is the holding company for Cathay Bank, a regional bank with deep roots in the Chinese-American community and a network of branches across multiple states. Founded in 1962 and based in Los Angeles, California, the company provides commercial lending, deposit services, international banking, and wealth management to individuals, professionals, and small-to-medium-sized businesses.

In recent market activity, CATY has been one of the stronger performers among regional banks. The stock has gained approximately 32% year-to-date and roughly 38% over the trailing twelve months, recently trading near $62.56 — just below its 52-week high of $63.91. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income of $315.1 million, or $4.54 per diluted share, representing a 10.2% improvement over 2024. Its net interest margin (NIM — the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits, expressed as a percentage) expanded to 3.36% in the fourth quarter of 2025, reflecting disciplined deposit cost management and a favorable asset mix. The efficiency ratio (a measure of operating expenses as a percentage of revenue; lower is better) stood at an impressive 43.41% for 2025, well below many regional peers. In Q1 2026, the company posted $213.2 million in revenue, up 11% year-over-year, exceeding analyst expectations. Institutional ownership sits at roughly 75%, and recent filings indicate fresh buying from institutions including HSBC. The company maintains a conservative dividend payout ratio near 31%, supporting a yield of approximately 2.3%.

HOPE Overview and Recent Performance

Hope Bancorp, Inc. is the bank holding company for Bank of Hope, which originated with a focus on Korean-American communities and has since expanded to serve a broad multicultural clientele across 12 states, including its newly established presence in Hawaii. Founded in 1986 and also headquartered in Los Angeles, HOPE provides commercial and industrial lending, commercial real estate financing, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, residential mortgages, and consumer banking products.

The past year has been transformational for HOPE. The company completed its acquisition of Honolulu-based Territorial Bancorp in April 2025, a deal that expanded its deposit base and added residential mortgage assets to its portfolio. However, the integration brought notable costs: HOPE's full-year 2025 GAAP net income was $61.6 million ($0.49 per diluted share), though adjusted net income excluding one-time items reached $113.3 million ($0.89 per share), up 10% from 2024. The company also executed a securities portfolio repositioning in mid-2025 that generated a near-term loss but is expected to contribute roughly $12 million annually to interest income going forward. In Q2 2026, HOPE reported revenue of $147.8 million, modestly above consensus, with adjusted EPS of $0.27. Net interest margin improved to 2.96%, up 27 basis points year-over-year, while criticized loans declined 19% from a year prior — an encouraging credit-quality signal. The stock recently traded near $13.45–$13.82, up about 25% year-to-date, though it carries a notably elevated P/E ratio above 26. HOPE's dividend yield of approximately 4.0% appeals to income-oriented investors, but the payout ratio exceeding 100% of reported GAAP earnings warrants scrutiny.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where regional bank stocks can be influenced by interest rate expectations, credit-cycle dynamics, and merger integrations, many traders are turning to algorithmic tools to help identify opportunities with greater speed and discipline. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies and timeframes. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots span multiple trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, and intraday momentum — and display real-time performance statistics such as annualized returns, trade frequency, and win rates, enabling users to evaluate each bot's track record transparently. For those looking to augment their decision-making with data-driven signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both CATY and HOPE operate as Los Angeles-based regional banks serving multicultural communities, their financial profiles and strategic positioning diverge meaningfully.

Profitability: CATY is the clear leader on almost every profitability metric. Its net margin of 23.79% dwarfs HOPE's 6.56%, while its ROE of 11.37% is more than double HOPE's 5.32%. CATY's return on assets (ROA — net income relative to total assets) of 1.38% similarly outpaces HOPE's 0.65%. This reflects CATY's more consistent operational execution and fewer one-time disruption events.

Valuation: CATY trades at a P/E ratio of roughly 12.8, compared to HOPE's approximate 26.9. This gap is substantial and partially reflects the market's recognition of CATY's higher earnings quality. However, HOPE's lower price-to-book multiple (approximately 0.7x) may attract value-oriented investors who see room for multiple expansion if post-merger earnings normalize.

Growth and Catalysts: CATY's growth story centers on steady organic loan expansion — total loans grew 4.0% to $20.15 billion in 2025 — and consistent NIM expansion. HOPE's growth narrative is more event-driven, hinging on the Territorial Bancorp integration, the securities portfolio repositioning, and ongoing deposit-cost optimization. HOPE's pending MANUBANK acquisition, expected to close in the second half of 2026, could provide another catalyst.

Risk Factors: CATY's concentrated exposure to the Chinese-American business community — while a source of franchise strength — could be a vulnerability in scenarios involving U.S.-China trade tensions or specific regional economic stress. HOPE faces integration risk from its Territorial acquisition and the execution challenges of absorbing another pending deal. HOPE's dividend payout ratio above 100% of GAAP earnings also introduces an element of uncertainty around dividend continuity.

Market Sentiment: Both stocks have benefited from the broader regional-bank rally, but CATY has attracted stronger institutional interest in recent months, with new positions from HSBC and increased stakes from other institutional investors. HOPE's higher institutional ownership (84%) is notable but has not translated into superior price momentum relative to CATY over the past year.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings quality, valuation discipline, and relative stability, an AI-driven analysis would likely favor CATY over HOPE in the current environment. CATY's superior net interest margin trajectory, meaningfully higher profitability ratios, cleaner earnings profile, and more conservative valuation combine to present a more predictable fundamental picture. While HOPE offers a turnaround narrative supported by an improving NIM, declining criticized loans, and a higher dividend yield, the elevated P/E multiple and ongoing integration complexity introduce variables that reduce probabilistic confidence. That said, AI models evaluating mean-reversion or deep-value signals may find HOPE's low tangible-book multiple and post-merger earnings potential compelling under specific strategy parameters. The overall balance of observable strength, however, tilts toward CATY for strategies prioritizing trend consistency and earnings visibility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CATY vs. HOPE commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a Hold and HOPE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $63.19 vs. HOPE: $14.01)
Brand notoriety: CATY and HOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 62% vs. HOPE: 71%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $4.22B vs. HOPE: $1.79B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.22B. HOPE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOPE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HOPE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than HOPE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOPE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOPE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOPE is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while HOPE (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CATY($4.22B) has a higher market cap than HOPE($1.79B). HOPE has higher P/E ratio than CATY: HOPE (13.60) vs CATY (12.37). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 32.412 vs. HOPE (30.730). HOPE has more cash in the bank: 209M vs. CATY (146M). CATY has less debt than HOPE: CATY (169M) vs HOPE (454M). CATY has higher revenues than HOPE: CATY (845M) vs HOPE (523M).
CATYHOPECATY / HOPE
Capitalization4.22B1.79B236%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.41230.730105%
P/E Ratio12.3713.6091%
Revenue845M523M162%
Total Cash146M209M70%
Total Debt169M454M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs HOPE: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
HOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2774
SMR RATING
1..100
3253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOPE's Valuation (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CATY (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOPE (74) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (42) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOPE (96) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYHOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFSV29.490.15
+0.51%
MFS Active Value ETF
DSCO24.81-0.02
-0.06%
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF
UNIY47.51-0.10
-0.21%
WisdomTree Voya Yld Enh USD Unvsl Bd Fd
INTL30.23-0.11
-0.36%
Main International ETF
FDNI27.75-0.20
-0.70%
First Trust Dow Jones Intl Intnt ETF