CAXPF vs GOCOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAXPF is a Hold and GOCOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAXPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGOCOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAXPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GOCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CAXPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GOCOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CAXPF | GOCOF | CAXPF / GOCOF | |
| Capitalization | 1.13M | 1.06M | 106% |
| EBITDA | -302.93K | -1.95M | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 100.488 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 56.50 | 0.69 | 8,207% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 522K | 2.83M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 127K | 21.6K | 588% |
CAXPF | GOCOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOCOF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAXPF (79). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.
GOCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CAXPF (100). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew similarly to CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.
CAXPF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GOCOF (95). This means that CAXPF’s stock grew similarly to GOCOF’s over the last 12 months.
CAXPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOCOF (75). This means that CAXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOCOF’s over the last 12 months.
CAXPF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GOCOF (100). This means that CAXPF’s stock grew similarly to GOCOF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KGLCX | 14.08 | -0.57 | -3.89% |
| Kinetics Global Adv C | |||
| EDIAX | 9.85 | -0.45 | -4.37% |
| Eaton Vance Global Income Builder A | |||
| WFDSX | 25.20 | -1.45 | -5.44% |
| Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst | |||
| OPMIX | 28.24 | -1.69 | -5.65% |
| Invesco Main Street Mid Cap R6 | |||
| PDGIX | 71.53 | -4.64 | -6.09% |
| T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth I | |||
CAXPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAXPF has been loosely correlated with GOCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAXPF jumps, then GOCOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAXPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAXPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GOCOF - CAXPF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MLGCF - CAXPF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TAOFF - CAXPF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MMTLF - CAXPF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CVWFF - CAXPF | 24% Poorly correlated | -17.22% | ||
More | ||||
GOCOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOCOF has been loosely correlated with CAXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOCOF jumps, then CAXPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOCOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOCOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CAXPF - GOCOF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MLGCF - GOCOF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EGPLF - GOCOF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RSNUF - GOCOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLI - GOCOF | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.56% | ||
More | ||||