Ad is loading...
CAZGF
Price
$1.89
Change
+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FTV
Price
$74.82
Change
-$0.79 (-1.04%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CAZGF vs FTV

Header iconCAZGF vs FTV Comparison
Open Charts CAZGF vs FTVBanner chart's image
Catapult Group International
Price$1.89
Change+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Fortive
Price$74.82
Change-$0.79 (-1.04%)
Volume$3.45M
CapitalizationN/A
CAZGF vs FTV Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAZGF vs. FTV commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAZGF is a Hold and FTV is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CAZGF: $1.88 vs. FTV: $74.82)
Brand notoriety: CAZGF and FTV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAZGF: 29% vs. FTV: 140%
Market capitalization -- CAZGF: $200.02M vs. FTV: $30.23B
CAZGF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $200.02M. FTV’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $30.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAZGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAZGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAZGF is a better buy in the long-term than FTV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FTV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CAZGF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -5.27% price change this week, while FTV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -6.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-6.43% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTV($30.2B) has a higher market cap than CAZGF($200M). CAZGF YTD gains are higher at: 121.765 vs. FTV (1.934). FTV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. CAZGF (-9.98M). FTV has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. CAZGF (16.2M). CAZGF has less debt than FTV: CAZGF (22.1M) vs FTV (3.81B). FTV has higher revenues than CAZGF: FTV (6.07B) vs CAZGF (84.4M).
CAZGFFTVCAZGF / FTV
Capitalization200M30.2B1%
EBITDA-9.98M1.57B-1%
Gain YTD121.7651.9346,295%
P/E RatioN/A34.82-
Revenue84.4M6.07B1%
Total Cash16.2M1.89B1%
Total Debt22.1M3.81B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAZGF vs FTV: Fundamental Ratings
CAZGF
FTV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5065
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4054
SMR RATING
1..100
9473
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTV's Valuation (44) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as CAZGF (66) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FTV (54) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to FTV’s over the last 12 months.

FTV's SMR Rating (73) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as CAZGF (94) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FTV (53) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to FTV’s over the last 12 months.

FTV's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAZGF (100) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VALE9.81-0.02
-0.20%
Vale SA
HCP33.74-0.16
-0.49%
HashiCorp
VCIG1.62-0.04
-2.41%
VCI Global Limited
AZUL2.67-0.11
-3.96%
Azul SA
ENVX8.48-0.37
-4.18%
Enovix Corp

CAZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAZGF and FTV have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAZGF and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAZGF
1D Price
Change %
CAZGF100%
+2.17%
FTV - CAZGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
WATT - CAZGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
HXGBF - CAZGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
GNSS - CAZGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
JELLF - CAZGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FTV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTV has been loosely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTV jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTV
1D Price
Change %
FTV100%
-1.04%
TRMB - FTV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
KEYS - FTV
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
MKSI - FTV
51%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
VNT - FTV
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
ST - FTV
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
More