CAZGF
Price
$4.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
200.02M
HXGBF
Price
$9.99
Change
-$0.56 (-5.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAZGF vs HXGBF

Header iconCAZGF vs HXGBF Comparison
Open Charts CAZGF vs HXGBFBanner chart's image
Catapult Group International
Price$4.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$194
Capitalization200.02M
Hexagon AB
Price$9.99
Change-$0.56 (-5.31%)
Volume$156
Capitalization26.03B
CAZGF vs HXGBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAZGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAZGF vs. HXGBF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAZGF is a Buy and HXGBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAZGF: $4.29 vs. HXGBF: $9.99)
Brand notoriety: CAZGF and HXGBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAZGF: 15% vs. HXGBF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CAZGF: $200.02M vs. HXGBF: $26.03B
CAZGF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $200.02M. HXGBF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $26.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAZGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAZGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HXGBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAZGF is a better buy in the long-term than HXGBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAZGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGBF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAZGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HXGBF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HXGBF is a better buy in the short-term than CAZGF.

Price Growth

CAZGF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +14.40% price change this week, while HXGBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +25.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+25.87% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HXGBF($26B) has a higher market cap than CAZGF($200M). CAZGF YTD gains are higher at: 99.535 vs. HXGBF (4.629). HXGBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. CAZGF (-9.98M). HXGBF has more cash in the bank: 505M vs. CAZGF (16.2M). CAZGF has less debt than HXGBF: CAZGF (22.1M) vs HXGBF (4.32B). HXGBF has higher revenues than CAZGF: HXGBF (5.37B) vs CAZGF (84.4M).
CAZGFHXGBFCAZGF / HXGBF
Capitalization200M26B1%
EBITDA-9.98M1.39B-1%
Gain YTD99.5354.6292,150%
P/E RatioN/A23.04-
Revenue84.4M5.37B2%
Total Cash16.2M505M3%
Total Debt22.1M4.32B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAZGF vs HXGBF: Fundamental Ratings
CAZGF
HXGBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1281
SMR RATING
1..100
9372
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HXGBF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAZGF (77). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HXGBF (81). This means that CAZGF’s stock grew significantly faster than HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGBF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CAZGF (93). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBF (61). This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGBF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CAZGF (100). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAZGFHXGBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAZGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRNO10.710.69
+6.89%
Murano Global Investments PLC
IPWR4.700.21
+4.68%
Ideal Power
MUSA423.018.11
+1.95%
Murphy USA
SUPN31.98-0.09
-0.28%
Supernus Pharmaceuticals
LFMD12.50-0.43
-3.33%
LifeMD

CAZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAZGF and FTV have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAZGF and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAZGF
1D Price
Change %
CAZGF100%
N/A
FTV - CAZGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
WATT - CAZGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGBF - CAZGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
GNSS - CAZGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
JELLF - CAZGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HXGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HXGBF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXGBF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXGBF
1D Price
Change %
HXGBF100%
-5.31%
HXGBY - HXGBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
SEPJF - HXGBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRKNF - HXGBF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
SOBR - HXGBF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
CAZGF - HXGBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More