CBAN
Price
$16.70
Change
-$0.47 (-2.74%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:04 PM (EDT)
29 days until earnings call
EBMT
Price
$15.92
Change
-$0.63 (-3.81%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:57 PM (EDT)
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBAN vs EBMT

Header iconCBAN vs EBMT Comparison
Open Charts CBAN vs EBMTBanner chart's image
Colony Bank
Price$16.70
Change-$0.47 (-2.74%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$15.92
Change-$0.63 (-3.81%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CBAN vs EBMT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAN vs. EBMT commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAN is a Hold and EBMT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CBAN: $17.17 vs. EBMT: $16.55)
Brand notoriety: CBAN and EBMT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAN: 104% vs. EBMT: 120%
Market capitalization -- CBAN: $201.92M vs. EBMT: $102.37M
CBAN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $201.92M. EBMT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $102.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEBMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EBMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAN is a better buy in the long-term than EBMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EBMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBAN and EBMT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while EBMT (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBAN is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBAN($202M) has a higher market cap than EBMT($102M). EBMT has higher P/E ratio than CBAN: EBMT (9.90) vs CBAN (9.02). CBAN YTD gains are higher at: 33.725 vs. EBMT (9.144). CBAN has more cash in the bank: 23M vs. EBMT (19.7M). EBMT (235M) and CBAN (238M) have identical debt. CBAN has higher revenues than EBMT: CBAN (114M) vs EBMT (83.3M).
CBANEBMTCBAN / EBMT
Capitalization202M102M198%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.7259.144369%
P/E Ratio9.029.9091%
Revenue114M83.3M137%
Total Cash23M19.7M117%
Total Debt238M235M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAN vs EBMT: Fundamental Ratings
CBAN
EBMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
4051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBAN (49). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to CBAN’s over the last 12 months.

CBAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (100). This means that CBAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

CBAN's SMR Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (51). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

CBAN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (45). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

CBAN's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (23). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBANEBMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CJPRY9.40-0.01
-0.05%
Central Japan Railway Co.
SMGZY22.39-0.27
-1.19%
Smiths Group Plc
BKRKY12.86-0.24
-1.83%
Bank Rakyat
REEMF0.37-0.03
-6.41%
Rare Element Resources Ltd.
ARWYF0.02-0.01
-25.27%
ARWAY CORP.

CBAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAN has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBAN jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAN
1D Price
Change %
CBAN100%
-0.81%
BFST - CBAN
77%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
AUB - CBAN
77%
Closely correlated
-2.99%
SHBI - CBAN
76%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
NWBI - CBAN
76%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
IBOC - CBAN
76%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
More