CBAOF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.31 (-17.13%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
JRHIF
Price
$570.00
Change
+$1.50 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
Ad is loading...

CBAOF vs JRHIF

Header iconCBAOF vs JRHIF Comparison
Open Charts CBAOF vs JRHIFBanner chart's image
CIBanco SA CTF Bursatiles Fiduciarios Inmobiliario
Price$1.50
Change-$0.31 (-17.13%)
Volume$4.96K
Capitalization1.58B
DAIWA SECS LIVING INVT
Price$570.00
Change+$1.50 (+0.26%)
Volume$3
Capitalization1.67B
CBAOF vs JRHIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAOF vs. JRHIF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAOF is a Hold and JRHIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAOF: $1.50 vs. JRHIF: $570.00)
Brand notoriety: CBAOF and JRHIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAOF: 73% vs. JRHIF: 27%
Market capitalization -- CBAOF: $1.58B vs. JRHIF: $1.67B
CBAOF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.58B. JRHIF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJRHIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JRHIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAOF is a better buy in the long-term than JRHIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBAOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CBAOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CBAOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -17.13% price change this week, while JRHIF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JRHIF($1.67B) has a higher market cap than CBAOF($1.58B). JRHIF has higher P/E ratio than CBAOF: JRHIF (23.03) vs CBAOF (7.18). JRHIF YTD gains are higher at: 0.264 vs. CBAOF (-17.127). JRHIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. CBAOF (4.26B). JRHIF has more cash in the bank: 14.9B vs. CBAOF (473M). CBAOF has less debt than JRHIF: CBAOF (15.7B) vs JRHIF (172B). JRHIF has higher revenues than CBAOF: JRHIF (22.1B) vs CBAOF (3.92B).
CBAOFJRHIFCBAOF / JRHIF
Capitalization1.58B1.67B94%
EBITDA4.26B16.2B26%
Gain YTD-17.1270.264-6,484%
P/E Ratio7.1823.0331%
Revenue3.92B22.1B18%
Total Cash473M14.9B3%
Total Debt15.7B172B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAOF vs JRHIF: Fundamental Ratings
CBAOF
JRHIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
73100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8687
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2682
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBAOF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JRHIF (57). This means that CBAOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JRHIF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JRHIF (100). This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to JRHIF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as JRHIF (100). This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to JRHIF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's Price Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as JRHIF (87). This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to JRHIF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JRHIF (82). This means that CBAOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JRHIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBAOFJRHIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTFCX43.200.60
+1.41%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
JSCOX23.580.13
+0.55%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value I
SVXYX56.550.12
+0.21%
Smead International Value Y
LVAFX10.220.02
+0.20%
LSV Global Managed Volatility Investor
ALMAX14.430.02
+0.14%
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth A

CBAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAOF has been loosely correlated with FCXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBAOF jumps, then FCXXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAOF
1D Price
Change %
CBAOF100%
N/A
FCXXF - CBAOF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SILA - CBAOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
PKST - CBAOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
JRHIF - CBAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFCG - CBAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More

JRHIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JRHIF and AFCG have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JRHIF and AFCG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JRHIF
1D Price
Change %
JRHIF100%
N/A
AFCG - JRHIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
CBAOF - JRHIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHPRF - JRHIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILA - JRHIF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
LVVR - JRHIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More