CBAOF
Price
$1.69
Change
-$0.04 (-2.31%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
SILA
Price
$25.39
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.47B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBAOF vs SILA

Header iconCBAOF vs SILA Comparison
Open Charts CBAOF vs SILABanner chart's image
CIBanco SA CTF Bursatiles Fiduciarios Inmobiliario
Price$1.69
Change-$0.04 (-2.31%)
Volume$6.5K
Capitalization1.58B
Sila Realty Trust
Price$25.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization1.47B
CBAOF vs SILA Comparison Chart
Loading...
SILA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAOF vs. SILA commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAOF is a Hold and SILA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAOF: $1.69 vs. SILA: $25.43)
Brand notoriety: CBAOF and SILA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAOF: 555% vs. SILA: 112%
Market capitalization -- CBAOF: $1.58B vs. SILA: $1.47B
CBAOF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.58B. SILA’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSILA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SILA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAOF is a better buy in the long-term than SILA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SILA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SILA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CBAOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while SILA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

SILA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.59% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBAOF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than SILA($1.47B). SILA has higher P/E ratio than CBAOF: SILA (37.17) vs CBAOF (7.18). SILA YTD gains are higher at: 4.564 vs. CBAOF (-6.740). CBAOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.26B vs. SILA (129M). CBAOF has more cash in the bank: 473M vs. SILA (17.3M). SILA has less debt than CBAOF: SILA (639M) vs CBAOF (15.7B). CBAOF has higher revenues than SILA: CBAOF (3.92B) vs SILA (180M).
CBAOFSILACBAOF / SILA
Capitalization1.58B1.47B107%
EBITDA4.26B129M3,304%
Gain YTD-6.7404.564-148%
P/E Ratio7.1837.1719%
Revenue3.92B180M2,178%
Total Cash473M17.3M2,734%
Total Debt15.7B639M2,457%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAOF: Fundamental Ratings
CBAOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SILA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SILA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIPTX16.28N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend I
NRILX14.50N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Sel R6
ANPRX28.91N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value R6
JNBZX9.87-0.08
-0.80%
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
FWDGX10.89-0.24
-2.16%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc 529-F-3

CBAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAOF has been loosely correlated with FCXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBAOF jumps, then FCXXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAOF
1D Price
Change %
CBAOF100%
-2.43%
FCXXF - CBAOF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SILA - CBAOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
PKST - CBAOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
JRHIF - CBAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFCG - CBAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

SILA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SILA and EQIX have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILA and EQIX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILA
1D Price
Change %
SILA100%
-0.12%
EQIX - SILA
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
NYMT - SILA
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
RSHPF - SILA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKST - SILA
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
AGNCM - SILA
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More