CBAUF
Price
$121.50
Change
-$0.29 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.93B
FANDF
Price
$4.28
Change
+$0.17 (+4.14%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
23.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBAUF vs FANDF

Header iconCBAUF vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts CBAUF vs FANDFBanner chart's image
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Price$121.50
Change-$0.29 (-0.24%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization118.93B
Firstrand
Price$4.28
Change+$0.17 (+4.14%)
Volume$308
Capitalization23.1B
CBAUF vs FANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAUF vs. FANDF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAUF is a Buy and FANDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAUF: $121.50 vs. FANDF: $4.28)
Brand notoriety: CBAUF and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAUF: 635% vs. FANDF: 7%
Market capitalization -- CBAUF: $118.93B vs. FANDF: $23.1B
CBAUF [@Major Banks] is valued at $118.93B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $23.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAUF is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBAUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FANDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBAUF is a better buy in the short-term than FANDF.

Price Growth

CBAUF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was +4.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.53% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBAUF($119B) has a higher market cap than FANDF($23.1B). CBAUF has higher P/E ratio than FANDF: CBAUF (18.15) vs FANDF (11.12). CBAUF YTD gains are higher at: 27.774 vs. FANDF (6.875). FANDF has less debt than CBAUF: FANDF (20.4B) vs CBAUF (161B). FANDF has higher revenues than CBAUF: FANDF (123B) vs CBAUF (25.8B).
CBAUFFANDFCBAUF / FANDF
Capitalization119B23.1B515%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.7746.875404%
P/E Ratio18.1511.12163%
Revenue25.8B123B21%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt161B20.4B789%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAUF vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
CBAUF
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
627
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1653
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANDF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CBAUF (99). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to CBAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (27). This means that CBAUF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

FANDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CBAUF (2). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to CBAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (53). This means that CBAUF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAUF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (53). This means that CBAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBAUFFANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MX4.110.08
+1.99%
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp
VREX8.800.08
+0.92%
Varex Imaging Corp
HASI27.260.04
+0.15%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc.
TS38.39-0.36
-0.93%
Tenaris S A
SYBX1.18-0.02
-1.67%
Synlogic

CBAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBAUF and CMWAY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBAUF and CMWAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAUF
1D Price
Change %
CBAUF100%
N/A
CMWAY - CBAUF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CICHY - CBAUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
BNDSF - CBAUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANDF - CBAUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANDY - CBAUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
NAUBF - FANDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
CMWAY - FANDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CICHY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HBCYF - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
BNDSY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More