Ad is loading...
CBBCX vs RMFCX
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. CBBCX (1.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs CBBCX (0.15). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBCX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. CBBCX (-11.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. CBBCX (30.10).
| CBBCX | RMFCX | CBBCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.880 | -2.681 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.83 | 1.87 | -631% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.40 | 6.27 | -166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 53.32 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.00 | 54.78 | 11% |