Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBCX vs RMFCX
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CBBCX (1.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs CBBCX (0.14). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBCX (33 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. CBBCX (-8.64). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. CBBCX (21.03).
| CBBCX | RMFCX | CBBCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.91 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.800 | 12.617 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.21 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.64 | 5.59 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.88 | 27.75 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.03 | 51.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.29 | 84.46 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement