Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBCX vs RMFCX
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.88
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.58B
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CBBCX (1.84B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs CBBCX (0.14). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBCX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. CBBCX (-5.12). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.04 vs. CBBCX (33.48).
| CBBCX | RMFCX | CBBCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.91 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.720 | 14.373 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.20 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | 6.61 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | 43.70 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.48 | 58.04 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.52 | 93.10 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement