CBBHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.15M
ETRUF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBBHF vs ETRUF

Header iconCBBHF vs ETRUF Comparison
Open Charts CBBHF vs ETRUFBanner chart's image
Cobalt Blue
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.6K
Capitalization15.15M
Etruscus Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization3.74M
CBBHF vs ETRUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ETRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBHF vs. ETRUF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBHF is a Buy and ETRUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CBBHF: $0.04 vs. ETRUF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CBBHF and ETRUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBHF: 166% vs. ETRUF: 87%
Market capitalization -- CBBHF: $15.15M vs. ETRUF: $3.74M
CBBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.15M. ETRUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileETRUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ETRUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBBHF and ETRUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBBHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETRUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBBHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ETRUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ETRUF is a better buy in the short-term than CBBHF.

Price Growth

CBBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +26.52% price change this week, while ETRUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBBHF($15.2M) has a higher market cap than ETRUF($3.74M). ETRUF YTD gains are higher at: 41.047 vs. CBBHF (-23.502). ETRUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.79M vs. CBBHF (-37.97M). CBBHF has higher revenues than ETRUF: CBBHF (1.93M) vs ETRUF (0).
CBBHFETRUFCBBHF / ETRUF
Capitalization15.2M3.74M406%
EBITDA-37.97M-1.79M2,126%
Gain YTD-23.50241.047-57%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.93M0-
Total CashN/A269K-
Total DebtN/A134K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBHF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBBHFETRUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ETRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABBV206.692.01
+0.98%
ABBVIE
TBRG19.280.13
+0.68%
TruBridge
BASE24.340.01
+0.04%
Couchbase
TMHC67.98-0.02
-0.03%
Taylor Morrison Home Corp
ACRV1.35-0.04
-2.88%
Acrivon Therapeutics

CBBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBHF and ILKAY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBHF and ILKAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBHF
1D Price
Change %
CBBHF100%
+0.24%
ILKAY - CBBHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
CUAUF - CBBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CBBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
More

ETRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETRUF has been loosely correlated with JMXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ETRUF jumps, then JMXXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETRUF
1D Price
Change %
ETRUF100%
N/A
JMXXF - ETRUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMTF - ETRUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBRFF - ETRUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTJHY - ETRUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - ETRUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More