CBBHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.66M
SRCAF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.06 (+50.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBBHF vs SRCAF

Header iconCBBHF vs SRCAF Comparison
Open Charts CBBHF vs SRCAFBanner chart's image
Cobalt Blue
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.5K
Capitalization15.66M
Stria Lithium
Price$0.18
Change+$0.06 (+50.00%)
Volume$170.5K
Capitalization6.86M
CBBHF vs SRCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBHF vs. SRCAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBHF is a Hold and SRCAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CBBHF: $0.04 vs. SRCAF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: CBBHF and SRCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBHF: 126% vs. SRCAF: 1500%
Market capitalization -- CBBHF: $15.66M vs. SRCAF: $6.86M
CBBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.66M. SRCAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBBHF and SRCAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBBHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBBHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SRCAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRCAF is a better buy in the short-term than CBBHF.

Price Growth

CBBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +18.90% price change this week, while SRCAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +49.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBBHF($15.7M) has a higher market cap than SRCAF($6.86M). SRCAF YTD gains are higher at: 331.884 vs. CBBHF (-28.111). SRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -658.84K vs. CBBHF (-37.97M). CBBHF has higher revenues than SRCAF: CBBHF (1.93M) vs SRCAF (0).
CBBHFSRCAFCBBHF / SRCAF
Capitalization15.7M6.86M229%
EBITDA-37.97M-658.84K5,763%
Gain YTD-28.111331.884-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.93M0-
Total CashN/A2.07M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBHF vs SRCAF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBHF
SRCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBBHF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCAF (51). This means that CBBHF’s stock grew similarly to SRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCAF (100). This means that CBBHF’s stock grew similarly to SRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (98). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (63). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (100). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBBHFSRCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMRC8.090.20
+2.53%
Digimarc Corp
MBWM49.140.43
+0.88%
Mercantile Bank Corp
JBS15.86-0.07
-0.44%
JBS NV Ordinary Shares - Class A
QFIN28.90-0.25
-0.86%
Qfin Holdings Inc
MI3.10-0.23
-6.81%
NFT Limited

CBBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBHF and ILKAY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBHF and ILKAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBHF
1D Price
Change %
CBBHF100%
N/A
ILKAY - CBBHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-9.52%
CUAUF - CBBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
ETRUF - CBBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.15%
More

SRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCAF and JNOMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCAF and JNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCAF
1D Price
Change %
SRCAF100%
N/A
JNOMF - SRCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUAUF - SRCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
ETRUF - SRCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LQRCF - SRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
CBBHF - SRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More