CBBHF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
SRCAF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBBHF vs SRCAF

Header iconCBBHF vs SRCAF Comparison
Open Charts CBBHF vs SRCAFBanner chart's image
Cobalt Blue
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$76.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Stria Lithium
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CBBHF vs SRCAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CBBHF vs. SRCAF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBHF is a Hold and SRCAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CBBHF: $0.06 vs. SRCAF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CBBHF and SRCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBHF: 215% vs. SRCAF: 239%
Market capitalization -- CBBHF: $94.89M vs. SRCAF: $2.49M
CBBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $94.89M. SRCAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCAF is a better buy in the long-term than CBBHF.

Price Growth

CBBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.19% price change this week, while SRCAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBBHF($94.9M) has a higher market cap than SRCAF($2.49M). CBBHF YTD gains are higher at: -60.000 vs. SRCAF (-77.457). SRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -524.54K vs. CBBHF (-6.13M). CBBHF has more cash in the bank: 2.06M vs. SRCAF (1.34M). SRCAF has less debt than CBBHF: SRCAF (750K) vs CBBHF (3.43M).
CBBHFSRCAFCBBHF / SRCAF
Capitalization94.9M2.49M3,813%
EBITDA-6.13M-524.54K1,168%
Gain YTD-60.000-77.45777%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash2.06M1.34M154%
Total Debt3.43M750K457%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBHF vs SRCAF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBHF
SRCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8897
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRCAF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBBHF (80). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (100). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBHF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCAF (98). This means that CBBHF’s stock grew similarly to SRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBHF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCAF (97). This means that CBBHF’s stock grew similarly to SRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCAF (100). This means that CBBHF’s stock grew similarly to SRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CBBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBHF and ILKAY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBHF and ILKAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBHF
1D Price
Change %
CBBHF100%
+29.59%
ILKAY - CBBHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CBBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUAUF - CBBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
SRCAF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCAF and JNOMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCAF and JNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCAF
1D Price
Change %
SRCAF100%
N/A
JNOMF - SRCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUAUF - SRCAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - SRCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LQRCF - SRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.80%
CBBHF - SRCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+29.59%
More