Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBZX vs RMFCX
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBZX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CBBZX (1.85B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBZX: RMFCX (1.20) vs CBBZX (1.14). CBBZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBZX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBBZX (0.63). CBBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBZX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBZX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. CBBZX (-2.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. CBBZX (41.78).
| CBBZX | RMFCX | CBBZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.849 | 14.779 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | 8.11 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.10 | 43.61 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.78 | 59.28 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.27 | 93.90 | 40% |