Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBZX vs RMFCX
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBZX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBBZX (1.84B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBZX: RMFCX (1.26) vs CBBZX (1.18). CBBZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBZX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBBZX (0.63). CBBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBZX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBZX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. CBBZX (-3.62). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. CBBZX (40.21).
| CBBZX | RMFCX | CBBZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.064 | 11.642 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.62 | 6.98 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.03 | 29.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.21 | 54.21 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.05 | 91.22 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement