Ad is loading...
CBECX vs RMFCX
CBECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBECX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value CL C
Price$10.07
Change+$0.21 (+2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.35M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.18
Change+$1.19 (+2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
CBECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBECX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. CBECX (148M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBECX: RMFCX (1.37) vs CBECX (0.12). CBECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBECX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBECX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBECX: RMFCX (250) vs CBECX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. CBECX (-20.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.36 vs. CBECX (-1.60).
| CBECX | RMFCX | CBECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.91 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.91 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.232 | 1.050 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.37 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.42 | 4.10 | -498% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.30 | 16.28 | -186% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.60 | 60.36 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.54 | 58.87 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers