CBFV
Price
$33.89
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
168.96M
27 days until earnings call
FCPB
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
113.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs FCPB

Header iconCBFV vs FCPB Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs FCPBBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$33.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$9.2K
Capitalization168.96M
First Capital Bancshares
Price$11.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
Capitalization113.23M
CBFV vs FCPB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. FCPB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and FCPB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $33.89 vs. FCPB: $11.97)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and FCPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 50% vs. FCPB: 63%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $168.96M vs. FCPB: $113.23M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $168.96M. FCPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than FCPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCPB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCPB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than FCPB.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while FCPB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($169M) has a higher market cap than FCPB($113M). FCPB has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: FCPB (22.17) vs CBFV (15.84). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 21.557 vs. FCPB (3.704). FCPB has less debt than CBFV: FCPB (3M) vs CBFV (34.7M). CBFV has higher revenues than FCPB: CBFV (49.3M) vs FCPB (26.3M).
CBFVFCPBCBFV / FCPB
Capitalization169M113M150%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.5573.704582%
P/E Ratio15.8422.1771%
Revenue49.3M26.3M187%
Total CashN/A1.01M-
Total Debt34.7M3M1,157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs FCPB: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
FCPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1428
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1219
SMR RATING
1..100
5973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
747
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCPB (81) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FCPB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCPB (19) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FCPB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's SMR Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCPB (73) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FCPB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCPB (50) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FCPB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCPB (47) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVFCPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRSEF116.47N/A
N/A
Hirose Electric
PXPHF6.52N/A
N/A
Pexip Hldg ASA
CDBMF0.61-0.01
-1.62%
Cordoba Minerals Corp.
TRUMF14.86-0.46
-3.01%
Terumo Corp.
RAFA0.05-0.01
-10.00%
Rafarma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (WY)

FCPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCPB and SFGIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCPB and SFGIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCPB
1D Price
Change %
FCPB100%
N/A
SFGIF - FCPB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FINN - FCPB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQFN - FCPB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARV - FCPB
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
CBFV - FCPB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More