CBFV
Price
$32.98
Change
+$0.25 (+0.76%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
164.01M
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GBCI
Price
$40.60
Change
+$0.35 (+0.87%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.28B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs GBCI

Header iconCBFV vs GBCI Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs GBCIBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.98
Change+$0.25 (+0.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization164.01M
Glacier Ban
Price$40.60
Change+$0.35 (+0.87%)
Volume$7.2K
Capitalization5.28B
CBFV vs GBCI Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. GBCI commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and GBCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.73 vs. GBCI: $40.25)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and GBCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 55% vs. GBCI: 76%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $164.26M vs. GBCI: $5.28B
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $164.26M. GBCI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than GBCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GBCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than GBCI.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while GBCI (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

GBCI is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBCI($5.28B) has a higher market cap than CBFV($164M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than GBCI: CBFV (62.83) vs GBCI (19.81). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 18.295 vs. GBCI (-18.023). CBFV has less debt than GBCI: CBFV (34.7M) vs GBCI (1.17B). GBCI has higher revenues than CBFV: GBCI (922M) vs CBFV (39.2M).
CBFVGBCICBFV / GBCI
Capitalization164M5.28B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.295-18.023-102%
P/E Ratio62.8319.81317%
Revenue39.2M922M4%
Total CashN/A375M-
Total Debt34.7M1.17B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs GBCI: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
GBCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
196
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1677
SMR RATING
1..100
7514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4977
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBCI's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (94). This means that GBCI’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBCI (77). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBCI’s over the last 12 months.

GBCI's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (75). This means that GBCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GBCI (77). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to GBCI’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBCI (90). This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than GBCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVGBCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCOMF7.25N/A
N/A
B Communications Ltd
TPGTF3.40N/A
N/A
TPG Telecom Ltd
IQEPY2.15N/A
N/A
IQE Plc
ASHTY245.83-5.51
-2.19%
Ashtead Group PLC
ALTPF0.03N/A
-13.48%
Altiplano Metals Inc.